Posted by Becca_FL on 4/19/05 11:42am
Msg #32629
New Fla Law Effect 5/1/05 Part II
I spoke with the recorders office in two counties, a RE attorney, three Title Cos & a Judge and the answer was the same; NOT TRUE! I called NotaryPro and told them that they had better get their information straight before printing it & calling it law. I did direct NotaryPro to this site & the all knowing PAW if they had any questions. Maybe they will post a retraction.
|
Reply by Jeanie-fl on 4/19/05 11:47am
Msg #32630
Thank you for the info n/m
|
Reply by PAW_Fl on 4/19/05 11:58am
Msg #32633
Same response here from the county building. Someone has made a grave error at Notary Pro.
|
Reply by anon on 4/19/05 12:07pm
Msg #32639
Its not a "grave" error. As an "over-requirement" how can it be "grave"? Although not required for recording, the general practice is to have 2 witnesses to the mortgage. If the lender requires it, then the requirement should be satisfied.
|
Reply by Sylvia_FL on 4/19/05 12:22pm
Msg #32648
The "grave error" is saying it is a new Florida law effective 5/1/05
We all understand that some lenders do require witnesses on the mortgages - and usually the borrowers do not like this - but to say it is a law or is going to be law is a grave error, they should be upfront and tell the truth, that they are requiring it.
I have had signings in the past where the borrower has been told that they have to have witnesses for the mortgage as it is a Florida law and have asked me if that is correct. I cannot lie, and tell them it is not a Florida law, they then call their LO wanting to know why they have to have witnesses, they do not want others knowing their business.
|
Reply by HisHughness on 4/19/05 12:28pm
Msg #32651
Becccccccccca reports:
***I did direct NotaryPro to this site & the all knowing PAW if they had any questions.***
Four legislators, seven governors, the United States Congress and the American Bar Association have PAW on a retainer, and always consult with him before making any public legal pronouncement. He was Johnny Cochran's closest adviser; OJ is most grateful for PAW's services. Michael is going to be sorry his attorney doesn't use him.
|
Reply by PAW_Fl on 4/19/05 12:34pm
Msg #32657
Your stats are in error. Only 6 governors, as Mitt Romney no longer employs my services. 
|
Reply by anon on 4/19/05 12:59pm
Msg #32663
you are "glorified paper shufflers"---nothing is really "grave"....
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 4/19/05 1:11pm
Msg #32665
Anon dismissively states: *you are "glorified paper shufflers"---nothing is really "grave"....*
Anon,
You found us out!
Now, why is it that you wanted to get into this business???
|
Reply by MaggieMae on 4/19/05 3:18pm
Msg #32701
Thank you for pointing this out HisHughness. I am in awe and humbled being in the company of such a dignitary.
|
Reply by Anonymous on 4/19/05 1:24pm
Msg #32671
TYPICAL NotaryPro
You guys really have to watch out for this SS. This is not the first time they have pulled the trigger to set something off.
|
Reply by anon on 4/19/05 1:33pm
Msg #32673
Re: Glorified Paper Shufflers
...but you are!
|
