Posted by Pazzella Colston on 2/5/08 10:19am Msg #234074
Working for Sox?? I dont Think So..
Sorry for shouting yesterday...I didnt realize I had all caps on. For the person who said I was advertising, I was merely answering the question of "Who is Pazzella Colston.
|
Reply by jba/fl on 2/5/08 10:29am Msg #234078
"For the person who said I was advertising, I was merely answering the question of "Who is Pazzella Colston."
That would have been me, and I never asked who you were. Neither did anyone else. You came on here shouting about SOX, then it looks as though you emailed a bunch of people because everyone else who posted said what a great job, person you are, totally without any relation to the subject: SOX
You managed to get your advertising, and today you are back to do it again. Are you the new Tony Negrete?
|
Reply by ssqu/ky on 2/5/08 3:19pm Msg #234137
jbl/fl...
“That would have been me, and I never asked who you were. Neither did anyone else. You came on here shouting about SOX, then it looks as though you emailed a bunch of people because everyone else who posted said what a great job, person you are, totally without any relation to the subject: SOX”
I'm part of "everyone else" who posted yesterday and I do believe my post WAS in relation to SOX. See message 234011 dated 2/4/08 2:50PM
|
Reply by ssqu/ky on 2/5/08 3:21pm Msg #234138
Sorry above post meant for jba/fl n/m
|
Reply by Barbara A Demonte on 2/5/08 3:32pm Msg #234142
Re: jbl/fl...
Yours was the only one complementing Pazz that even mentioned SOX. Also, why come on shouting a year later about a post. I didn't see where anyone demanded to know who Pazz was and Pazz only had to link their name to their profile for anyone who was interested to find out. It was a clear case of advertising on the part of Pazz, of which the message has been removed by the forum moderator as advertising. And the last post in that thread was pandering for complements.
|
Reply by ssqu/ky on 2/5/08 4:10pm Msg #234144
Re: jbl/fl...
Did I miss something?? What did you mean by saying "Also, why come on shouting a year later about a post".
Stephanie
|
Reply by Barbara A Demonte on 2/5/08 5:42pm Msg #234160
Re: jbl/fl...
Pazz came on shouting with the first entry of the thread and indicated that the current response was to a post made a year ago, typing in all caps is considered shouting on a forum.
|
Reply by ssqu/ky on 2/5/08 6:40pm Msg #234173
Re: jbl/fl...
Okay, Thanks.
Stephanie
|
Reply by jba/fl on 2/5/08 5:17pm Msg #234149
ssqu/ky: yes, you posted 234011, but the first shouting
message was 233994. If you read, you will see that the thread begins there. Your message is a higher number, that means that you posted later, or after, the shouting began.
If you really want to re-read the thread, you will find that there was not one person and or message asking who this person is. As Barbara pointed out, the final message on that thread was posted pandering for comments by others as to how great they are. Also, that being the case, there was no reason to bring this up this morning on message 234074, continuing the advertising thread.
Miss Kentucky: I have a business, and I would love to get as much exposure for it as I can. It does not relate to notary signing agent work though, but since there seem to be a few that feel this is ok, do you think that I can go ahead and advertize here? I would like to take advantage of Notary Rotary's reputation of being one of "the" places to go. Oh, I know, not notary related, but I need to just slip it in a few times a month - that would be ok? It is something that would benefit you, a thing of true beauty? Please?
|
Reply by ssqu/ky on 2/5/08 6:38pm Msg #234172
Re: ssqu/ky: yes, you posted 234011, but the first shouting
I did not and do not disagree with you concerning the advertising. You will have to admit, even your "first" post had no relation to the subject: SOX
Stephanie
|
Reply by ZeeCA on 2/5/08 11:11am Msg #234083
if you want anyone to know who you are than link your
profile to your comments.
also, your last comment yesterday was way out of line on someone else's forum. JMO
|
Reply by Roger Proctor Sr on 2/5/08 12:07pm Msg #234092
Re: if you want anyone to know who you are than link your
Why don't you give it a rest. I have been fortunate enough to have had the privlege to work with Pazz and have found her to be very professional and has always met her obligations and would consider it a honor to work with her again if given the opportunity. Oh and by the way she didn't email me or pm me to have me say this. I do believe if you all didn't have something to bi*** about you wouldn't be happy.
|
Reply by jba/fl on 2/5/08 1:59pm Msg #234121
Roger, I'm glad you have been fortunate to work w/this co.
and I am sure that you enjoy them, BUT, this was a pure violation of rules of the site.
Since this co. is so great, I am sure that you want to play your cards close to your chest so that if this business is built to the point that they have 75 notaries in every city in the US, you won't have to worry about being called again at the price you have established between you and this co. Think about it...
|
Reply by jba/fl on 2/5/08 2:00pm Msg #234122
Roger: did you also notice I can reply without calling you
any names?
|
Reply by Roger Proctor Sr on 2/5/08 2:16pm Msg #234124
Re: Roger: did you also notice I can reply without calling you
and what name did i call you? i don't see where i called anyone a name.
|
Reply by jba/fl on 2/5/08 4:51pm Msg #234147
Re: Roger: did you also notice I can reply without calling you
I do believe if you all didn't have something to bi*** about you wouldn't be happy.
Ok, Implied.
|
Reply by Roger Proctor Sr on 2/5/08 8:45pm Msg #234191
Re: Roger: did you also notice I can reply without calling
implication is a far cry from identification
|