Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the

Re: "to me known to be"
Posted by MikeC/TX of TX on 4/20/19 6:15pm Msg #605620
"To me known" is kind of archaic language, but let's think this through.

Did you see their ID and confirm that they were who they said they were? If so, "to me known" is a correct statement, because you now KNOW that the person before you is the person whose ID you have seen. Otherwise, why are you notarizing the signature?

You either KNOW that this is that person, or you might THINK that this might really be that person, and I'm not aware of any state that allows you to notarize a signature for someone you THINK is the person sitting before you. The whole point is that you have to KNOW they are who they say they are, based on their ID.

I've seen responses suggesting rewording the statement to something like "proven to me to be", which is fine if that's acceptable in your state. But if the original wording is how your state requires it to be, I don't see a problem with it.
PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message

Messages in this Thread
 "to me known to be" - lynnyw on 4/20/19 12:46am
 Re: "to me known to be" - Lee/AR on 4/20/19 6:01am
 Re: "to me known to be" - Linda_H/FL on 4/20/19 6:18am
 Re: "to me known to be" -  VT_Syrup on 4/20/19 9:28am
 Re: "to me known to be" - Ronnie_WA on 4/20/19 10:25am
 Re: "to me known to be" - Luckydog on 4/20/19 11:07am
 Re: "to me known to be" - MikeC/TX on 4/20/19 6:15pm
 Not sure if I'm comparing apples to oranges ... - BearPaw/CO on 4/21/19 11:23am
 Good topic! "Proven" it is! n/m -  Ernest__CT on 4/22/19 10:20pm

Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2019, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.