Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the


Re: Jurats
Posted by CaliNotary of CA on 12/6/04 12:32am Msg #12796
Not really. What it states is:

"Key wording of an acknowledgment is "personally appeared." It is not acceptable to affix an acknowledgment to a document mailed or otherwise delivered to a notary whereby the signer did NOT personally appear before the notary, even if the signer is known by the notary. Also, it is not acceptable to affix a notary seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording. "

It's emphasizing that the signer MUST personally appear in front of the notary. It's a little confusing, I think they should have said "The key words in an ack...". But it's not referring to how the acknowledgement should be worded, it's just emphasizing that the key to acknowledging somebody is that they appear in front of you.

Remember, that part of the handbook is the "instructional" part. As such, it is less formally written than the "laws" part. The specific regulation states " Any certificate of acknowledgment taken within this state shall be in substantially the following form". "Substantially" in this case means that it can vary slightly. I've seen ID affadavits that don't have the (s) after person, only offer he/she but not "they" as an option, etc. Basically, anything parenthetical or with a / in it can be tailored to the specific form, but the other wording must stay exactly the same.
PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message


Messages in this Thread
 Jurats - Elizabeth_CA on 9/19/04 11:02am
 Re: Jurats - Sylvia_FL on 9/19/04 11:07am
 Re: Jurats - Elizabeth_CA on 9/19/04 11:10am
 Re: Jurats - Sylvia_FL on 9/19/04 11:24am
 Re: Jurats - CaliNotary on 12/5/04 11:32pm
 The SS was correct - FB/CA on 9/19/04 11:27am
 Re: The SS was correct - Hampton/CA on 9/19/04 1:32pm
 Re: The SS was correct - Elizabeth_Ca on 9/19/04 3:50pm
 Re: The SS was correct - Elizabeth_CA on 9/19/04 4:39pm
 Re: The SS was correct - Sylvia_FL on 9/19/04 5:51pm
 Re: The SS was correct - Maureen/nh on 9/19/04 8:56pm
 Re: Jurats - Jon on 9/19/04 9:05pm
 Re: Jurats -  Joan Bergstrom on 9/19/04 11:11pm
 Re: Jurats - Elizabeth_CA on 9/19/04 11:23pm
 Re: Jurats - Eliz/CA on 12/5/04 6:18pm
 Re: Jurats - CaliNotary on 12/5/04 11:40pm
 Re: Jurats - Eliz/CA on 12/5/04 11:52pm
 Re: Jurats - CaliNotary on 12/6/04 12:32am



 
Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
 
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2025, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.