**If you don't think it will work then we need someone who does.**
What did I miss here?
Can we all put in our two cents? Or not? Especially among "friends" I thought there was room for discussion, etc. Okay I am moving over the to other end of the room in front of the fireplace. Yet again, this is confusing. |
| Messages in this Thread |
|  Repost by request! Organize! In numbers we have strength! -  Charles_Ca on 2/13/06 3:21pm |
|  Re: Repost by request! Organize! In numbers we have strength! - BrendaTx on 2/13/06 3:24pm |
|  Re: Repost by request! Organize! In numbers we have strength! - BrendaTx on 2/13/06 3:26pm |
|  Re: Repost by request! Organize! In numbers we have strength! - srnotary_CA on 2/13/06 3:35pm |
|  Re: Repost by request! Organize! In numbers we have strength! - eXpedN_TX on 2/13/06 4:58pm |
|  Re: Repost by request! Organize! In numbers we have strength! - BrendaTx on 2/13/06 5:09pm |
|  Re: Repost by request! Organize! In numbers we have strength! - srnotary_CA on 2/13/06 5:28pm |
| The trial is very interesting... - eXpedN_TX on 2/13/06 10:35pm |
| 10-4 Brenda. But only if it is an independant body of - Charles_Ca on 2/13/06 3:36pm |
| I agree, it does need to be a - Bonnie_CO on 2/13/06 3:40pm |
| This, Charles, is the way it MUST be - TitleGalCA on 2/13/06 3:44pm |
| Thanks TG, well said as usual! n/m - Charles_Ca on 2/13/06 3:51pm |
| Finally, for the moment, anyhow... - BrendaTx on 2/13/06 3:59pm |
| Re: Finally, for the moment, anyhow... - Beth/MD on 2/13/06 4:10pm |
|  Thanks Beth, but for it truly to be a grass roots situation - Charles_Ca on 2/13/06 4:25pm |
|  Re: Thanks Beth, but for it truly to be a grass roots situation - BrendaTx on 2/13/06 4:32pm |
|  Re: Thanks Beth, but for it truly to be a grass roots situation - BrendaTx on 2/13/06 4:51pm |
|  Yes, No and Maybe - I don't want to be the point man - Charles_Ca on 2/13/06 6:35pm |
|  Re: Yes, No and Maybe - I don't want to be the point man - BrendaTx on 2/13/06 7:08pm |
|  Once you find the point man.... - eXpedN_TX on 2/13/06 10:36pm |
| Okay, lots of nice semantics and lofty ideals.... - TitleGalCA on 2/13/06 5:24pm |
| I don't know why that wink thing shows up "Notaries"? n/m - TitleGalCA on 2/13/06 5:25pm |
| Re: Okay, lots of nice semantics and lofty ideals.... - Charles_Ca on 2/13/06 6:39pm |
| Re: Okay, lots of nice semantics and lofty ideals.... - CaliNotary on 2/13/06 6:45pm |
| I'd say you're perfectly qualified.... - TitleGalCA on 2/13/06 8:51pm |
| Excuse me? - TitleGalCA on 2/13/06 6:47pm |
 | Re: Okay, lots of nice semantics and lofty ideals.... - BrendaTx on 2/13/06 7:45pm |
| Re: Okay, lots of nice semantics and lofty ideals.. I agree - Janet Berger on 2/13/06 8:33pm |
| Thank you Janet - - TitleGalCA on 2/13/06 8:45pm |
| Another thought... - JanetK_CA on 2/13/06 8:54pm |
| Re: Another thought... - TitleGalCA on 2/13/06 9:02pm |
| I have no problems being point.... - Shane_OH on 2/13/06 10:42pm |
| Re: I have no problems being point.... - TitleGalCA on 2/13/06 11:00pm |
| Another possible perspective - but add my name - Linda_in_MI on 2/14/06 6:34am |
| Where are you? - Dorothy_MI on 2/14/06 7:04am |
