Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the


I second that!
Posted by BP/WV of WV on 4/6/06 3:07pm Msg #111624
Brenda,

I have been toying with the idea of charging extra for fax backs for about 3 months now. I kept a little journal of the fax backs that were required. I made notations of who it was for, how many pages and the overall time it took to fax and resort the package. What I came up with was astonishing.

Within the month of March, I had 14 packages that required fax backs above 30 pages. The calculated average time to fax and resort came to 32 minutes. This time totaled over 7 ˝ hours of uncompensated time for the month of March

I used this method to determine the time it also took to split and copy packages.

My total time spent on faxing, splitting and resorting docs in March came to 10 hours and 45 minutes.

On April 1st I began asking, “Will there be any fax backs required?”. I inform them that I now charge for fax backs and tell them my rate. So far, I have had several tell me that no fax backs are required but when the package arrives…viola…in very large print on the second page: THE FOLLOWING LIST OF CRITICAL DOCS MUST BE FAXED BACK OR YOUR FEE WILL BE REDUCED…So, I call them back and remind them that I charge for this service and what my fee is.- No problem so far.

One attorney told me that Joe Schmoe down the street doesn’t charge a dime for fax backs.

The way I see it is: So what if Joe Schmoe down the street faxes for free? Let Joe Schmoe burn up his business equipment and waste time. I now refuse to provide this service at no cost. I charge because my time is valuable to me. I run a business, not a charity. Besides that, try taking a stack load of documents to Kinkos and see if you can fax for free.

I too will now pass on the individuals who refuse to pay for fax backs.

Have a good one!.
PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message


Messages in this Thread
 Yes, another revisit to the fax back... -  BrendaTx on 4/6/06 12:57pm
 Re: Yes, another revisit to the fax back... -  Tina_MA on 4/6/06 2:10pm
 Re: Yes, another revisit to the fax back... - LilyMD on 4/6/06 2:47pm
 I second that! - BP/WV on 4/6/06 3:07pm
 Re: I second that! -  BrendaTx on 4/6/06 4:03pm
 Re: I second that! -  Trenton Hall on 4/6/06 4:48pm
 Re: I second that! -  BrendaTx on 4/6/06 5:30pm
 Re: I second that!..Brenda -  BatmanWA on 4/6/06 5:00pm
 Oops.."pay the price FOR..." not our... n/m -  BatmanWA on 4/6/06 5:03pm
 Re: I second that!..Brenda -  BrendaTx on 4/6/06 5:07pm
 Brenda-Slight thread hijack/good news - SarahBeth_CA on 4/6/06 7:22pm
 Re: I second that! - MonicaFL on 4/6/06 4:25pm
 I do remember when fax backs were not required. - BP/WV on 4/6/06 8:17pm
 Re: I second that! -  BrendaTx on 4/6/06 8:57pm
 Our time and knowledge - Dorothy_MI on 4/6/06 5:24pm



 
Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
 
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2026, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.