Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the


An oldie but goodie that once again feels very relevant...
Posted by JanetK_CA of CA on 1/20/26 10:41pm Msg #651981
For decades now, mediocre Signing Services have tried to rope in notaries by promising them 'volume' if they'll lower their fees. [These days, they use the platform to just offer up signings a lower fees up front.] That works great for them, because their overhead doesn't much change with increased volume - unless they need to add to their staff. We're the ones doing the driving, printing, etc., so 'volume' doesn't work the same for us.

Yoli recently found an old post that did a wonderful job of clarifying the fallacy that we can increase our income by doing more work at a lower fee. Since it might have gotten buried down that thread, I'm posting it here again for those who might have missed it: Msg #488879. In that post, Marian Harmon did a great job of spelling out how that's not the same for us.

While reading over some of the old threads about this issue, I ran across an old post of my own where I used Marian's numbers and tried to spell it out even more clearly with some specific examples, and doing the math. In case you're interested, here's that post: Msg #550749. I realize that platforms and email blasts have changed the dynamics of all of this, but I believe it's important to understand how this impacts our profitability. I like the idea of working less and earning more! That's one of the key reasons I'm doing more GNW these days and am particular about what assignments I accept from signing services.

If/when business does begin to pick up again as interest rates rise, and people start seeing higher rates as a new normal, I urge you all to take these facts to heart, and don't give away your services or devalue your worth, leaving the profit to those in the middle...
PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message


Messages in this Thread
 An oldie but goodie that once again feels very relevant... - JanetK_CA on 1/20/26 10:41pm
 Re: An oldie but goodie that once again feels very relevant... -  Cheryl Elliott on 1/21/26 9:01am
 Thank you Janet - I hope all take the time to - Linda_H/FL on 1/21/26 11:27am
 AMEN! Go for the Gold! -  Cheryl Elliott on 1/21/26 12:24pm
 Re: Thank you Janet - I hope all take the time to - Melissa Perez on 1/21/26 6:03pm
 Re: Thank you Janet - I hope all take the time to -  JanetK_CA on 1/22/26 1:24am
 Very good advice, Janet....I think the phrasing is - Linda_H/FL on 1/22/26 11:52am
 Very good advice, Janet....I think the phrasing is - Linda_H/FL on 1/22/26 11:52am
 Re: Thank you Janet - I hope all take the time to - Peggy Johnson on 1/22/26 9:23am
 Not true, Peggy - it's been done and CAN be done - Linda_H/FL on 1/22/26 11:56am
 Re: Not true, Peggy - it - Peggy Johnson on 1/24/26 6:35am
 Simple fix/avoid redraft - mark it "NSA Fee $xxx POC". done n/m - Linda_H/FL on 1/24/26 7:47am
 About 90% of mine did have my name when I started - Moneyman/TX on 1/22/26 12:15pm
 Depends on circumstances, e.g. working direct with title -  JanetK_CA on 1/23/26 1:04am
 Re: An oldie but goodie that once again feels very relevant... - Leo_FL on 1/27/26 10:20pm
 Re: An oldie but goodie that once again feels very relevant... -  JanetK_CA on 1/29/26 2:27pm



 
Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
 
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2026, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.