Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the


Yes, it could (and should) be more simply put...
Posted by  Lisa Prestegard of FL on 5/3/07 11:03pm Msg #188727
but we all know how the gov't agencies work, don't we? I wouldn't count on it changing any time soon. I have my own horror stories of dealing with RECD/HUD/USDA for nearly 10 years. I still have nightmares of 12-month projected budgets based on 9-month actuals... ugh.

I think the reason (not that it's reasonable!) that the signature lines were put at the top is so the Co-Borrower (provided there is a Co-Borrower) can understand at the onset of application that he/she is applying for credit by completing the application.

The TIL serves a useful purpose, but I agree that it's confusing for 99% of the population. Have you done a Countrywide loan? If so, you see the "Definition of Truth in Lending Terms" that follows directly. I take that document and put it along side the TIL and tell the Borrower that it best explains the TIL. I don't explain. I don't opine. I just show them the page and most of the time, they figure it out. I think every TIL should have a "Definition of Truth in Lending Terms". I keep one handy at every signing for exactly that purpose.

*sigh*
When they make me Queen, things will change... I promise Smile
PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message


Messages in this Thread
 new 1003 - Mary Irene Mccomb on 5/3/07 7:28pm
 Re: new 1003 -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 8:11pm
 Re: new 1003 - Lisa -  Sylvia_FL on 5/3/07 10:27pm
 Re: new 1003 - Lisa -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:10pm
 Re: new 1003 - Lisa -  LynnNC on 5/4/07 8:10am
 Where? - JanetLA on 5/3/07 9:01pm
 No, it really isn't open to interpretation -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 9:52pm
 Re: No, it really isn't open to interpretation - GF_CA on 5/3/07 10:24pm
 Re: No, it really isn't open to interpretation - pan/nd on 5/3/07 10:25pm
 Yes, it could (and should) be more simply put... -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:03pm
 Re: Yes, it could (and should) be more simply put... - pan/nd on 5/3/07 11:15pm
 From one mouse to another, I couldn't agree more -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:27pm
 YES it really IS open to interpretation - JanetLA on 5/4/07 8:28am
 Agree, JanetLA. I have single BOs put 'N/A' to show (s)he -  Susan Fischer on 5/5/07 10:59pm
 Re: new 1003 -  Joe Ewing on 5/3/07 10:48pm
 Re: new 1003 -  Joan Bergstrom on 5/3/07 11:12pm
 Maybe this will explain it... -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:24pm
 Re: Maybe this will explain it... - pan/nd on 5/3/07 11:37pm
 PAW has convinced me that the intent of the regulatory.... - Bob_Chicago on 5/4/07 1:15am
 Think who we are and what we do -  Ndwa on 5/4/07 2:41am
 Re: Think who we are and what we do -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/4/07 6:39am
 Crazy as it seems -  BrendaTx on 5/4/07 7:20am
 Re: Crazy as it seems - LauriecPA on 5/4/07 8:20am
 I do both ways... - Lee/AR on 5/4/07 8:30am
 One Would Think... -  Dennis D Broadbooks on 5/4/07 8:43am
 Re: One Would Think... - JanetLA on 5/4/07 8:56am
 Why Not? - Brad/AZ on 5/4/07 9:47am
 Re: One Would Think... -  BrendaTx on 5/4/07 12:57pm
 Re: new 1003 - Elizabeth Soliday on 5/4/07 12:40pm



 
Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
 
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2024, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.