And again with the reading comprehension problems.
I SAID we didn't know what was in them, didn't I? Or did you skip that part?
Show me where I gave a preformed conjecture or opinion, beyond the FACTS that the folders were labeled as confidential and were empty. I questioned what was in them, and where the contents might be now. Those are reasonable questions. Show me where I suggested anything about what your hero did with the missing documents.
I'm not following your logic comparing empty file folders with banker boxes full of your records. So what? I have filing cabinets full of old records. What I don't have is a bunch of empty file folders that are labelled with contents they don't have. Do you? If you do, you're a bigger pack rat than I am.
You say I have no facts. I have plenty of facts regarding what the law says about the handling of government documents. Why don't you regale us with the facts YOU have? Or do you just reflexively jump to your leader's defense, regardless of what he has done, like any good cult member would do?
|
