Posted by Jeremy Brown on 4/22/08 8:29pm Msg #244613
Jurat and Acknowledgement Verbiage on same Doc.
There is Jurat and Acknowledgement Verbiage on same Doc. What do i do?
|
Reply by sue_pa on 4/22/08 8:32pm Msg #244615
Oh, I don't know ... perhaps notarize them?
|
Reply by Jeremy Brown on 4/22/08 8:40pm Msg #244622
thanks smart ass.
|
Reply by LKT/CA on 4/22/08 8:47pm Msg #244623
Sent you a P/M n/m
|
Reply by LKT/CA on 4/22/08 8:39pm Msg #244621
If they are compliant with CA wording, notarize them and put stamp near EACH. If the wording is not compliant with CA wording, attach an Ack and Jurat certificate.
|
Reply by dickb/wi on 4/22/08 8:56pm Msg #244624
i have never known a doc to have both.....it's usually 1 or.
the other.....you need to check with title or the lender and see which they would prefer.....when i said i have never known a doc to have both i meant to have both executed.
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 4/22/08 10:09pm Msg #244631
DickB...I see it all the time...ack and jurat on same doc-
ument.
Suppose it is an affidavit which needs to be recorded?
The affidavit requires a jurat. The county clerk wants to see an ack.
|
Reply by LindaD/NJ on 4/22/08 8:58pm Msg #244625
Is it from LSI and is it a Wells Fargo? If so I had the same thing.The Jurat as LSI told me does not belong on the paper. Was put on for a single loan and they forgot to take it off.
|
Reply by LKT/CA on 4/22/08 9:06pm Msg #244630
For signings I do for TX properties, I see it alot. I notarize them both. Have never had a problem.
|
Reply by LindaD/NJ on 4/22/08 9:02pm Msg #244627
I also sent you a pm n/m
|
Reply by Hugh Nations Signing Agents of Austin on 4/22/08 11:52pm Msg #244637
Certain Texas loan documents often have both a jurat and an acknowledgement. In fact, on occasion I have seen a single notarization in which the signer swears, subscribes to the instrument and acknowledges the signature. Texas, though, is notoriously loose about what is required for notarization.
|
Reply by Gerry_VT on 4/23/08 6:55am Msg #244646
Why both?
There is a logical reason there might be both a jurat and acknowledgement certificate for a document. They serve a different purpose. When a signer takes an oath, he's swearing that the document is true. When he acknowledges a document, he says he want's to be bound by the terms of a contract. Suppose my partner and I execute a deed transfering our joint property to just me. Suppose I know there is an error in the legal description, but can't afford to have a survey done to fix it. So I want to agree to the contract, but I don't want to swear it's true, because it isn't. If someone needed assurance that the contract is both true and agreed to, they would require both a jurat and an acknowledgement certificate.
|
Reply by Sandra Clark on 4/23/08 10:31am Msg #244690
The few times I have seen both on same page, the ack. was a California ack and the jurat was for other areas. I used jurat
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 4/23/08 10:38am Msg #244692
Sandra - - why didn't you complete both notary certitifcates n/m
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 4/23/08 11:46am Msg #244697
Not referring to Jeremy's post but to this subject in
general: When there's both a jurat and an acknowledgment.
Why wouldn't you simply complete both certficates?
Why would you think it was your responsibility to decide on one or the other?
Does any state's rules say: You cannot have a jurat and acknowledgment on the same document?
The reason you'll see this on the same document from time to time is because it is an affidavit which needs to be recorded. You need an acknowledgment to make the recording people happy. So, before you decide to pick one and move on please consider that you are leaving the notarization incomplete if you do not compete both certificates.
|
Reply by Sandra Clark on 4/23/08 11:56am Msg #244700
Re: Not referring to Jeremy's post but to this subject in
Because at the top of both ack and jurat it stated "California Loans" and the jurat stated "all others" so the decision was made for me. Hope that answers your question
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 4/23/08 12:08pm Msg #244702
Got it! Thank you. n/m
|