Posted by FGX/NJ on 8/3/12 8:41am
Msg #429203

Chris Hawkins NN responds to article in legal language re Va


Scroll down to see his reply

http://www.legallanguage.com/legal-articles/are-online-notarizations-valid/

Reply by Linda_H/FL on 8/3/12 9:29am
Msg #429211

I'm curious how he justifies a NJ Notary doing a webcam

notarization over a year ago...

Reply by sigtogo/OR on 8/3/12 11:28am
Msg #429233

scroll further to see Jim Lissemore's response w/ link

Jim Lissemore Says:
August 3rd, 2012 at 11:07 am
Signnow/Notarynow is the same company that was performing invalid webcam notarization using NJ Notaries.
After they were banned by the NJ Atty. Gen Office of NJ
they tried using a Notary in the Mariana Islands.
http://www.saipantribune.com/newsstory.aspx?cat=1&newsID=110897

Reply by VT_Syrup on 8/3/12 1:03pm
Msg #429260

Re: scroll further to see Jim Lissemore's response w/ link

The newspaper story linked by sigtogo/OR does not contain the word "Lissemore". Also, the story is from 2011.

Reply by BrendaTx on 8/3/12 1:08pm
Msg #429261

VT you are looking at the wrong link.

http://www.legallanguage.com/legal-articles/are-online-notarizations-valid/

Scroll down.

Reply by Sylvia_FL on 8/3/12 1:09pm
Msg #429262

Re: scroll further to see Jim Lissemore's response w/ link

sigtogo was pasting Jim Lissemore's response which included that link If you go to the original post and look at the lonk and scroll down to Jim Lissemore's response you will see word for word what sigtogo posted.

It was confusing

Reply by sigtogo/OR on 8/3/12 2:40pm
Msg #429267

oops! sorry for the confusion n/m