Posted by Toots on 1/12/05 9:19pm Msg #16517
Legal mambo jumbo...
RE: Notary Forms
So, when my SOS says that "The following forms are sufficient for the purposes indicated, if completed with the information as required by law: ...." Does this mean that if more information is given, it would be acceptable?
For example, acknowledgement certificate:
State of _______ County of ________
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the (date) by (name).
Seal signature
If Lender sends a package with a certificate with the CA ack verbiage, would it be ok for me to use since all the info required is included?
|
Reply by colorless/AZ on 1/12/05 10:10pm Msg #16522
I have found the certificate and language to which you refer. It is in your notary handbook, and it looks like the answer to your question might be located in your handbook on page 29, (K.S.A. 53-508(b).)
|
Reply by Becca/FL on 1/12/05 10:12pm Msg #16523
Firat of all Toots, please post the state in which you reside and practice; ie: Toots/FL or Toots/CA. By doing so, you will receive better answers to your questions.
As for your question, that depends. What state are you in, what does the SOS require in a notarial certificate and so on.
Check your handbook and if you can't find the answer call the SOS. It is your job to understand the notarial laws of your state. It's not just "legal mumbo jumbo".
|
Reply by Toots on 1/12/05 10:49pm Msg #16529
Ok, I don't think you understand my question....let me rephrase it.
**The following forms are sufficient for the purposes indicated, if completed with the information as required by law:
State of _______ County of ________
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the (date) by (name).
Seal signature** This is quoted from KS SOS handbook.
Given the above statement (**-**), does the notarial cert have to be exact, word for word as above or could it be alright to use wordings like a CA ack cert which contains MORE information
|
Reply by Becca/FL on 1/12/05 10:55pm Msg #16532
Again - If you are not sure and can not find the info in your manual, contact your SOS. Many of us are not in Kansas (Dorothy) and can not answer your question. Do the research, go to the source, get the answer(s) you need to do the work. 'Nuf said.
|
Reply by Toots on 1/12/05 11:02pm Msg #16533
Is it me, or can some people not understand the question?
|
Reply by colorless/AZ on 1/12/05 11:39pm Msg #16534
I saw you post earlier that you were in Kansas and I did go look up your state's handbook online, did you read the area I told you about?
|
Reply by Toots on 1/12/05 11:55pm Msg #16536
Let me try to ask the question again....I know what it says in my handbook. I quoted it in my post. My question was in reference to what it says in the handbook. When it said "sufficient for the purpose indicated, if completed with the information required..." does it mean that it doesn't have to be exact wording, word for word, but that, as long as it provides the required information it would fine?" As an example, the CA ack verbiage contains more information that required by KS, would it therefore be permissable to use CA ack wording?
|
Reply by BrendaTX on 1/13/05 12:34am Msg #16539
I understand your question, but I cannot answer it for you.
As Becca said, if the manual does not answer the question for you, call your secretary of state.
|
Reply by HisHughness on 1/13/05 12:43am Msg #16541
Mambo = male mamba Mambo jumbo = Big-assed mambo Legal mambo jumbo = Big-assed mambo with greencard
|
Reply by Toots on 1/13/05 12:47am Msg #16543
Thanks for the humor....really needed it!
|
Reply by colorless/AZ on 1/13/05 12:53am Msg #16544
Try paragraph 7 on page 11.
|
Reply by Toots on 1/13/05 1:00am Msg #16545
What I understand in this paragraph is simply the origination of the document....not the notarial wording.
What do you understand by "sufficent for the the purpose indicated, if completed with the information as required" (this is the legal mumbo jumbo I was referring to)
|
Reply by colorless/AZ on 1/13/05 1:09am Msg #16546
I'm not trying to be rude but I have already read more of your handbook than I care to. If this were my handbook I would not need to ask the question you have asked because I can see the answer is there. However, I am not a lawyer, I am not your SOS and all I can do is point to were the answer is. I therefore, respectfully, request that you now read paragraph 29 on page 18.
Page 18 29. What should I do when I have a question about performing a notarial act? Contact the secretary of State's office for assistance or your legal counsel for advice.
|
Reply by BrendaTX on 1/13/05 1:16am Msg #16547
Exactly.
|
Reply by colorless/AZ on 1/13/05 1:22am Msg #16548
Brenda,
I called you back. He FINALLY got the software loaded it took all day. Call tomorrow when you have time, okay. I'll be here.
|
Reply by BrendaTX on 1/13/05 2:44am Msg #16558
Will do.
|
Reply by Becky on 1/13/05 2:06am Msg #16552
What's the matter with you people?
The poor lady is not asking how to word the acknowledgment or what it says in her SOS handbook. She knows what it says...but she is asking our opinion what it means! What does it mean "sufficient for the purpose".
Toots, I believe it means that as long as you have the required information, it is sufficient. You can have a page long acknowledgment, but as long as it has all the required information, it is alright.
++++ this is what I think ++++
Food for thought: if we direct all our questions to the relavant entities....why do we need this forum?
|
Reply by Terri - CA on 1/13/05 2:12am Msg #16554
Re: What's the matter with you people?
Unfortunately, the poster is asking others to interpret the poster's state's Handbook. That we cannot do. Now if another Kansas Notary were to be posting, he or she might be willing to post what their interpretation is.
Thus, the answer is, we are unable to interpret the statement given to you by your State's Handbook. Please contact your State's SOS office for clarification of the issue.
I know that for California, there are certain criteria that must be met in order for me to use another state's acknowledgment verbiage. Since I don't have it memorized, I keep my handbook with me and refer to it as necessary. I compare the criteria to the verbiage, if it meets the criteria, then I can use it. But since that's such a pain (and not something I want to do in front of a borrower), I'll usually just attach a Loose California All Purpose Acknowledgment. Then I know I've complied with my state's laws, period.
So, perhaps one answer could be, why worry about it, cross it out, attach a certificate that contains your states verbiage.
Terri Lancaster, CA
|
Reply by BrendaTX on 1/13/05 2:40am Msg #16556
Re: What's the matter with you people?
Becky said in relvant part: "++++ this is what I think ++++"
And, Toots still does not have a definitive answer to this question.
Referring a notary back to their rules to find the 100% accurate answer is not something I feel badly about.
If it were me and my commission I'd rather pick up the phone and get the right answer rather than have to later defend myself by saying, "Well, since a poster on NotaryRotary.com thought it was okay, I took her word for it."
I know the final answer for Texas, but I would not presume to interpret the Kansas Law by the standards of the office of the Secretary of State in Texas.
Perhaps we don't need these forums. Opinions and guesses by well-meaning people may do more harm than good.
We can use forums to guide us toward getting the answers. Period. But we are each responsible for doing the notary part of our job. Even if you work for a lawyer, you are still responsible for your notary duties.
I cannot state enough times for other notaries that is extremely important to get to the source of answers for yourself. You'll get a lot of insight on the NSA business here, but do not rely on forum advice. Get the answer for yourself.
|
Reply by Charm_AL on 1/13/05 8:03am Msg #16565
Amen Brenda!!!
Really! The laws are different for every state...Why do people come here for answers that can be illegal within their own states? Go back to basic notary public 101... Call your SOS or Sec. of State! geeze
|
Reply by Dennis D Broadbooks on 1/13/05 9:35am Msg #16573
Well Stated, Brenda.
Forums such as this can be a great aid OR they can turn into a debacle for someone seeking an answer that's specific to their state. I'm continually amazed at the individuals who are willing to post responses to questions from states other than their own. No disclaimers (other than showing their home state in their "handle"), no "seek the answer on your own", no "this is simply my opinion", or no "this is the answer for MY state"...all they do is lay it out as if it were gospel for all concerned, when they could very easily be leading that person astray because their state laws differ.
A good example of this is the widely accepted "fact" it's verboten (implication: forbidden, cannot do, illegal) to notarize a document with blank spaces in it. While it's a good "idea" to have all spaces filled in...as a Missouri Notary Public I cannot decline to place my seal on a document for that reason alone. While our MO SOS office "highly encourages" us as Notaries to make the signer aware of the fact the document contains blank spaces, it's still not left up to us as to whether to proceed with the notarization or not based solely on that criteria. If someone were to ask me to notarize a document with blank spaces in it, I then advise them that's it's "better" if they fill the blank spaces in, & their desire is to continue on without following this admonition...I have no choice legally but to notarize the document.
Another issue I see repeated ad infinitum is the discomforting practice of quoting laws/statutes off the Internet from other states & presenting it as fact to a poster who's asked a question. I'd submit this is a foolish practice, bordering on dangerous. Unless you're from the same state as the person who's asking the question, a fellow poster has no business quoting laws or statutes off web sites & pretending this is the final, definitive answer. Who knows if this person's research is accurate or timely? Laws change continually & are updated every single day. Rather than provide the answer to someone in a legal area I think it's infinitely wiser to point them in a direction & have them do their own research. BTW, I'm not talking about replies referencing non-legal issues such as whether to use a FedEx drop box or not. I'm restricting my comments to those who think they're the "legal beagles" for the entire country for no apparent good reason other than wanting to be the first to provide the answer. To satisfy your desires in this area I'd suggest you become a contestant on Jeopardy or at the very least start inserting some disclaimers in your answers. Yes it's incumbent on each of us to be responsible for what we "take to the bank", but I also believe there's also a responsibility we hold to our fellow posters to avoid leading them down a primrose path.
JMHO!
|
Reply by Maureen/nh on 1/13/05 11:23am Msg #16589
Re: Well Stated, Brenda.
You know the old saying" you can lead a horse down the primrose path but you can't make him smell the coffee."
|
Reply by CarolynCO on 1/15/05 12:04pm Msg #16880
I hope before I get to the bottom of this particular thread that you have taken it upon yourself to call your SOS.
|
Reply by Becca/FL on 1/13/05 9:54am Msg #16575
Listen, Toots...
we understand the question, you are simply NOT understanding the answer.
Thanks to Brenda, Cali & Dennis for saying what I could not say last night. Hopefully, your comments will enlighten some of the newer folks on this board and motivate them to do the proper research.
|
Reply by Notary_Girl on 1/13/05 11:12am Msg #16587
Re: Listen, Toots...
Boy this is a tough group.. Kind of reminds me of High School... I do understand all your points as to NOT being able to specifically answering the question... What I don't understand is the "attitude" towards Toots... But then again I haven't kept up with this group for a while and maybe I am missing something... I will have to go back through and read up! In any event, I hope everyone has a great day! I would like to ask a question, do you find that January (well at least the first couple of weeks so far), typically are slower over all? I mean is it something to be expected every year? I know that other businesses can pretty much predict which month(s) will be the slowest for them and I was just wondering if that is the case with a NSA business? And if that is the case, I was wondering what you do to supplement your income during the slow periods of this business? TIA for the information Linda.....
|
Reply by Urban/PA on 1/13/05 12:12pm Msg #16595
Re: Listen, Toots...
During the months of January - March, you should begin to see calls boost in April. Check into providing services such as: safe deposit drillings for local banks ( in most states, an internal notary can't perform the act), getting licensed as a card agent for the Department of Motor Vechicles in your state, offering services at hospitals, nursing homes, etc. If you are good at taking pictures, you can do field inspection work for companies. They may ask you to check to see if a repair was done or to go to a designated place to inspect if people put flyer hangers on a person's front door and take pictures as proof.
|
Reply by Happy in Fl on 1/13/05 8:04pm Msg #16650
Or, you can...
use the time to catch up on all the "Honey Do's".
|