Posted by Anonymous on 10/19/05 9:00am
Msg #71159
Are client only allows us to pay $40.
It sucks to be you then. Click!
|
Reply by Art_MD on 10/19/05 9:13am
Msg #71162
Re: Are client only allows us to pay $40. BS !!!
That's more BS.
If a company gives a SS a signing to fill, they are paying $xxx to the SS. They don't care how SS spends the $xxx as long as they get the signing done.
Art
|
Reply by BLE/MD on 10/19/05 9:21am
Msg #71168
Re: Are client only allows us to pay $40. BS !!!
$40??? Yea ... right.
|
Reply by Frances MacDonald on 10/19/05 9:38am
Msg #71178
Re: Are client only allows us to pay $40. BS !!!
$40? The borrower better be my next door neighbor or live in my neighborhood . Isn't the SS person calling us and offering less just a rep working for the SS? I assumed when they said "we can't meet your fee", in essence, they were saying, "My Boss won't let me pay you that much", not the TC. I do enough direct TC work that the standard SS fee to TC is usually about $250. Tho, I work for some SS that pay as well as the TC. Free Enterprise at it's finest, folks.
|
Reply by LawrenceOK on 10/19/05 10:33am
Msg #71189
Re: Are client only allows us to pay $40. BS !!!
I concur, "My CLIENT only allows $xxx" is the biggest bunch of cow dung I ever heard. You are willing to pay me $40 but my fee is $xx, that puts you in the hole $xx.
|
Reply by Shelly_FL on 10/19/05 6:12pm
Msg #71268
Re: Are client only allows us to pay $40. BS !!!
I want to know if that was a question or am I reading it wrong?
I once got a SA application with numerous misspellings and so much incorrect grammer, I had to read most everything twice to understand it. After some consideration, I filed it in FILE 13. I email them back, politely declined and encouraged them to review their package for errors so that the image they intend to portray would appear more proffessional.
|
Reply by CaliNotary on 10/19/05 6:47pm
Msg #71276
Re: Are client only allows us to pay $40. BS !!!
"I once got a SA application with numerous misspellings and so much incorrect grammer, I had to read most everything twice to understand it. After some consideration, I filed it in FILE 13. I email them back, politely declined and encouraged them to review their package for errors so that the image they intend to portray would appear more proffessional."
You misspelled "grammar" and "professional". Normally I wouldn't point this out to you, but in the context of this post I thought it was appropriate.
And yes, the original post was very poorly written. "Our client only allows us to pay $40" is apparently what he was told by a signing service, and the "sucks to be you" is his response to that statement.
|
