Posted by sn/oh on 2/15/07 3:25pm
Msg #175867
Question on a different kind of Name Affidavit
After perusing through through the threads of early 2006, I came across the following Name Affidavit. This identical Affidavit was sent to me for someone with a HELOC loan.
The borrower was not an Attorney in Fact, neither was she "well and truly known" by me.
Here is how it read:
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said Country and State, on this day personally appeared "Ms. A. Borrower" as Attorney in fact ( Affiant), a credible person to me well and truly known, who, having been by me first duly and lawfully sworn upon oath deposes ant states:
The Affiant is one and the same as "Ms. A. Doe"
"Ms. Alice Doe"
"Ms. Alice Borrower"
who is refinancing the property located at ___________________________________
The Second half of the Legal size paper states the following:
AFTER carefully reading the foregoing affidavit, the Affiant does hereby solemnly swear that the facts set forth herein are true and correct, to witness which Affiant sets had and seal the 15th day of February, 2007.
Signature of Ms. A. Borrower
by _________________________ as Attorney in fact
Sworn and subscribed by the above Affiant before me, the undersigned Notary Public on this
day of __________________________________.
____________________________________
Notary Public, County, Ohio
My Commission Expires
etc, etc....
Would one just attach a jurat certificate to the above affidavit and call it a day?
Is the "Attorney in Fact" portion of the affidavit a mistake on the Title Company's part?
|
