Posted by DT on 1/5/07 2:10pm
Msg #169431

Signatures Plus does it again...but thank you guys

After reporting them to the FTC.gov I received my check a week later. (yesterday) 1-4-07. The check was dated 11-6-06.

Because I had read your posts I was aware of the NSF's so I took it to their bank and it was no good.

I may not ever get my money but they will certainly know I have been around. I have reported them again, wrote the president of signatures plus, the accounts payable (debbie hastings, and the lender.

I wonder if they know passing NSF checks in against the law? I AM NOT DONE YET!

Anyone still waiting for their money and want to join me in this fight, let me know.

Reply by Poppy on 1/5/07 2:12pm
Msg #169434

Doesn't the DA's office have a bad check department?

Sorry, I should go back and read the previous posts I'm sure someone has discussed it in the past.
But I would think that if they are passing bad checks the DA would be able to get involved.

Reply by DT on 1/5/07 2:37pm
Msg #169440

Re: Doesn't the DA's office have a bad check department?

I just contacted the lender and the FTC again. The FTC said in their email that is part of what they do is investigating these sort of things. I know someone at the DA's office so I am going to check. Anyone else know?

Reply by JessNC on 1/5/07 2:57pm
Msg #169442

Me, too, DT...I knew I probably shouldn't do it for Signatures Plus, but it was for a fellow notary's closing and I really wanted to help her out - I even mentioned their reputation on this board and said I would give them the benefit of the doubt this time because of the situation (helping out my friend). Well, it's 3 months later and still nothing. I was told that a check was cut, but nope - didn't even get that...

Click on my link and email or call me....where in NC are you?

Reply by notarymd on 2/6/07 1:54pm
Msg #174309

Unfortunately, I took assignments last November and December from SP without doing my homework. As a Signing Agent, I am on the road and do not always have the luxury of research before agreeing to a job. I've never not been paid, so I agreed to the work in good faith.

I did initially consider submitting reports to the BBB and the Atty Gen., but after reading so many bad reviews, I decided I needed to go straight to their money source. I communicated with HLC's vendor services and they emailed SP (with a CC to me) reminding them to pay me. I did get a response from SP indicating that I would be paid within a week. I forwarded this response back to my HLC contact with a CC to her boss. I'm not holding my breath.

I did question HLC and asked why they continued to use SP's services. HLC indicated to me that SP was currently under examination due to the numerous complaints. HLC's Vendor Services is located at 163 Technology drive, Irvine, CA 92618 and Signatures Plus is located at 220 Technology, Irvine, CA 92618 -- they're neighbors.

Could SP's actions be considered fraud and, if so, could HLC (by their affiliation with SP and their knowledge of the non-payment problem) then be considered a co-conspirator?

By the way, SignaturesPlus (according to HLC) also does business as X Marks the Spot.

Reply by Christine Ortiz on 5/4/07 6:32pm
Msg #188881

Message Deleted

This message has been deleted by a forum moderator.

Reason: Author Request - Special Exception