Posted by Harry [NR] on 6/21/07 4:58pm
Msg #196362
Private Message Notifications - Opinions?
We've had a couple requests for PM notifications. This feature is something we were working on, but it didn't make the initial release of private messaging. If the following options were available in connection with private messages, which would you choose?
1) Don't notify me when a new PM is received.
2) Send me an e-mail when a new PM is received.
3) Send a text message to my cell phone when a new PM is received.
4) Send me a fax when a new PM is received.
5) Send me an e-mail when a new PM is received, but ONLY if I have acknowledged the last PM.
6) Send a text message when a new PM is received, but ONLY if I have acknowledged the last PM.
7) Send me a fax when a new PM is received, but ONLY if I have acknowledged the last PM.
Options 5 - 7 are obviously designed to keep our system from burying active messengers in notifications.
Thanks,
Harry
|
Reply by Cam/CA on 6/21/07 5:00pm
Msg #196363
I'd choose option 2 n/m
|
Reply by LC/AZ on 6/21/07 5:02pm
Msg #196364
Re: I'd choose option 2
Agree.
|
Reply by dickb/wi on 6/21/07 5:25pm
Msg #196378
Re: I'd choose option 2 n/m
|
Reply by CaliNotary on 6/21/07 5:05pm
Msg #196366
I'd choose #5. I don't see the need for a separate email for every message when one email will serve the same purpose.
I'd also like to see a ban on messages on the board that say "you have a PM", that is beyond tiresome 
|
Reply by Lee/AR on 6/21/07 6:25pm
Msg #196402
I'm with Cali...#5 n/m
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 6/21/07 6:26pm
Msg #196403
Re: I'm with Cali...#5 - yep, #5 n/m
|
Reply by JanetK_CA on 6/21/07 10:30pm
Msg #196448
Re: I'm with Cali...#5 Same here - same reason n/m
|
Reply by Cynthia/CA on 6/21/07 5:07pm
Msg #196367
Option 2 - works for me.
|
Reply by Dave_CA on 6/22/07 9:18am
Msg #196479
#5 n/m
|
Reply by Gerry_VT on 6/21/07 5:08pm
Msg #196368
5 n/m
|
Reply by Sylvia_FL on 6/21/07 5:13pm
Msg #196369
#5 is fine:) n/m
|
Reply by Brenda/CA on 6/21/07 5:30pm
Msg #196380
Re: #5 is fine:) n/m
|
Reply by rengel/CA on 6/21/07 5:16pm
Msg #196371
#2 is my preference. Maybe that will cut out the "you have p/m" messages.
Thank you for thinking of us Harry!
|
Reply by ZeeCA on 6/21/07 5:18pm
Msg #196372
2 is my choice ... and it would elimanate the you have PM n/m
|
Reply by LkArrowhd/CA on 6/21/07 5:19pm
Msg #196373
Re: 2 works for me n/m
|
Reply by cara on 6/21/07 5:24pm
Msg #196375
Re: Private Message Notifications - Opinions? #2 n/m
|
Reply by cara on 6/21/07 5:24pm
Msg #196376
Re: Private Message Notifications - Opinions? #2 n/m
|
Reply by DebbieT on 6/21/07 5:30pm
Msg #196379
Re: #2 Works for me!!!! n/m
|
Reply by MikeC/NY on 6/21/07 5:31pm
Msg #196381
Option 5 makes the most sense to me n/m
|
Reply by kcg on 6/21/07 5:38pm
Msg #196384
Option #2 n/m
|
Reply by Robin_IN on 6/21/07 5:46pm
Msg #196386
#2 - n/m
|
Reply by MB_AZ on 6/21/07 5:49pm
Msg #196389
#5 - n/m
|
Reply by cyndi_ca on 6/21/07 6:01pm
Msg #196392
Re: #2 - n/m
|
Reply by DogmongerCA on 6/21/07 5:48pm
Msg #196388
Option 2 NM
NM
|
Reply by Signing_Doc on 6/21/07 5:57pm
Msg #196391
I take one #2.......and a side of fries please n/m
|
Reply by JenCA on 6/21/07 6:18pm
Msg #196396
Re: #2 OR #3 n/m
|
Reply by FLdocrunner on 6/21/07 6:29pm
Msg #196404
#2 works for me n/m
|
Reply by Brenda_CO on 6/21/07 6:45pm
Msg #196406
I choose option 2
And, thanks for giving us options. That what I love about this site!!!
|
Reply by Pierces Notary Services on 6/21/07 7:10pm
Msg #196409
#5 n/m
|
Reply by Pierces Notary Services on 6/22/07 4:53am
Msg #196459
Amend that #2 and #5 n/m
|
Reply by christiSocal on 6/22/07 5:21am
Msg #196460
Re: Amend that #2 and #5 n/m
|
Reply by Sandra Clark on 6/21/07 7:50pm
Msg #196413
I'm for #2
|
Reply by Katie/AZ on 6/21/07 7:54pm
Msg #196415
I choose option # 2
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 6/21/07 7:58pm
Msg #196417
Re: Option 2 for me n/m
|
Reply by SE/Florida on 6/21/07 8:08pm
Msg #196419
Option #2 n/m
|
Reply by VBNotaryVA on 6/21/07 8:18pm
Msg #196421
2. n/m
|
Reply by Jon_PA on 6/21/07 8:22pm
Msg #196423
#5 n/m
|
Reply by Deblynn/CA on 6/21/07 8:34pm
Msg #196424
#2 please n/m
|
Reply by Tess on 6/21/07 8:50pm
Msg #196428
Re: 2 & 5 with option to block individual if needed? n/m
|
Reply by Della Elswood on 6/21/07 9:18pm
Msg #196434
Re: #2 is my choice n/m
|
Reply by ZLee_Califia on 6/21/07 9:27pm
Msg #196438
#2 ...Thank You... n/m
|
Reply by Pam/MS on 6/21/07 9:32pm
Msg #196440
#2 - . n/m
|
Reply by spnotaryplus on 6/21/07 10:12pm
Msg #196443
Re: #5 - works for me n/m
|
Reply by Todd/OH on 6/21/07 10:21pm
Msg #196444
Option 2 n/m
|
Reply by Michelle/AL on 6/21/07 10:48pm
Msg #196450
One of the reasons I log on to your site regularly is to
check for PMs. If you make it too easy for me (i.e., fax or email me notifications) I will log on a lot less. I like the set up the way it is now.
|
Reply by OR on 6/21/07 11:56pm
Msg #196455
Re: 2 or 5 or just leave it is fine with me thks n/m
|
Reply by christiSocal on 6/22/07 4:10am
Msg #196458
5, thanks n/m
|
Reply by Bob_Chicago on 6/22/07 7:20am
Msg #196462
Whatever you call what you currently do, works for me. 1?? n/m
|
Reply by Ernest__CT on 6/22/07 8:14am
Msg #196466
Private Message Notifications - Opinion 5, please. n/m
|
Reply by Marlene/USNA on 6/22/07 9:54am
Msg #196482
I finally trained myself to log on every time I read the Forum, so that's enough notification for me.
|
Reply by Terri_CA on 6/22/07 3:25pm
Msg #196487
Option #5 one notification via e-mail
then none others until messages are read/acknowledged.
|
