Posted by Jeffrey Sestilio on 8/7/08 4:48pm Msg #259166
I've got a signing but the title
company said only to use their estimated closing statement. Shouldn't the borrower have and sign the HUD?
|
Reply by MW/VA on 8/7/08 5:06pm Msg #259176
This does get confusing. On the closings that I do for some CA tc's, they only use an "Estimated Closing Statement". I've been told that's how they do it, and that they finalize the figures at disbursement.
|
Reply by CopperheadVA on 8/7/08 6:31pm Msg #259191
I agree with MW/VA - if it's a CA title company, they only give you an estimated closing statement.
|
Reply by Ilene C. Seidel on 8/7/08 7:23pm Msg #259196
I've had a couple of them in Md, don't remember where the title co was located. It is unusual.
|
Reply by JanetK_CA on 8/7/08 7:43pm Msg #259198
The others are right. It's pretty much SOP in CA. It's rare that I see a final HUD in a package - and then nearly always from out of state escrow companies.
|
Reply by PAW on 8/7/08 9:06pm Msg #259213
CA is an escrow closing state, not a table funding state
That's why CA only provides estimated settlement statements, because the payments are just that, an estimate, until the payoffs are settled. Then a final statement is produced. For table funding states, the HUD at the table is considered final and that's the figures that will be used for settlement.
|