Posted by KKinNoCal on 1/10/08 11:26am
Msg #229971

California question

I am replacing every acknowledgement and Jurat in the package- with the new 2008 variety. ( I am also filling out the ack. or Jurat enclosed and not stamping it) , I got a letter from a Title co. saying that the filed ack. (deed of trust) needs to be the new acknowledgment. They did not say anything about the other ones. I am doing this correctly or just adding a lot of work for myself-thank you for your responses.

Reply by qmriley on 1/10/08 11:29am
Msg #229972

adding alot of work just cross out the old ack/jurat and put "see attached Certificate" and put the new one behind it.

Reply by Carmi/CA on 1/10/08 12:06pm
Msg #229984

I agree with gmriley n/m

Reply by Phillip/TX on 1/10/08 11:32am
Msg #229973

Not in CA but...

I would not complete something that is incorrect at all, stamp or no stamp. I would do as suggested and just line thru and attach the correct form behind it, no need to even say see attached.

Reply by qmriley on 1/10/08 11:33am
Msg #229974

Re: Not in CA but...

we do have to say see attached

Reply by Phillip/TX on 1/10/08 11:34am
Msg #229975

My mistake then. n/m

Reply by janCA on 1/10/08 1:57pm
Msg #230008

Re: Not in CA but...

Is that in the CA handbook? And if it is, where?

Reply by rengel/CA on 1/10/08 2:17pm
Msg #230014

We have to replace

EVERY acknowledgment and jurat that does not comply with the 2008 law whether it will be filed with a county recorder or not.