Posted by Samantha Coppa on 1/16/08 1:03pm
Msg #230895
Message Deleted
This message has been deleted by a forum moderator.
Reason: Author Request - Special Exception
|
Reply by SamIam on 1/16/08 1:08pm
Msg #230896
Re: Southern CA closing statistics 2005 vs. 2007/08
Please LMK if you know how I can edit my original post to hide my name! 
|
Reply by Glenn Strickler on 1/16/08 2:56pm
Msg #230911
Re: Southern CA closing statistics 2005 vs. 2007/08
A judge would have to have been on vacation on Pluto for the past 18 months not to know that the sub-prime market has collapsed. Billions of dollars of write downs on losses, lenders that have gone under, been sold. Title companies closing down.
Probably would not be to hard to search the posts on the forums print them out as there have been dozens of posts on how bad business has been. Do some research on Google. Plenty of info out there. ....
|
Reply by Les_CO on 1/16/08 3:48pm
Msg #230925
Re: Southern CA closing statistics 2005 vs. 2007/08
From what I’ve read, or heard, this is the normal luncheon agenda for CA judges. Don’t expect any ruling that can have any bearing on what is happening in the real world.
|
Reply by SamIam on 1/16/08 4:30pm
Msg #230942
Re: Southern CA closing statistics 2005 vs. 2007/08
That's what I'm worried about - a judge who is out of touch with reality and does not have the 'common knowledge' that the market is crashing and burning. I was thinking about printing out some threads here but wasn't sure if the content would be admissible. I'm going in without a lawyer so I need my ducks in a row.
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 1/16/08 4:32pm
Msg #230945
Write and beg Grif to remove your post. n/m
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 1/16/08 4:37pm
Msg #230948
Re: Southern CA closing statistics 2005 vs. 2007/08
**I am taking my X to court in order to increase the amount of child support.
I know that he is going to try to convince the judge how much extra I can/should be earning if I was still doing notary work.**
In California it may work differently, but in Texas you'd need to be more worried about what he is making, not what you are making if you have primary custody. If a dad makes $200,000 and has custody and mom makes $15,000 a year and doesn't have primary custody, mom is still going to pay child support and probably be required to keep medical insurance on the child.
So...I'm just saying that I hope you do know how this process works in CA. In Texas you'd need to have filed papers to ask for proof of dad's income.
I just wonder if it is that much different in California...if YOU need to worry about justifying anything about a "what-if" situation.
|
Reply by Ilene C. Seidel on 1/16/08 4:49pm
Msg #230953
Re: Southern CA closing statistics 2005 vs. 2007/08
I agree with Brenda, in addition it's hard to imagine a judge ordering you to work a second job when you have to take care of the little one.
|
Reply by SamIam on 1/16/08 5:47pm
Msg #230971
Re: Southern CA closing statistics 2005 vs. 2007/08
I have a good handle on the calculations from http://www.childsup.cahwnet.gov/Resources/CalculateChildSupport/tabid/114/Default.aspx
I was laid off from my full time job in August and have been unemployed since.
I know the judge will impute my wages and I just wanted to have some backup info on the notary biz.
Thanx for your input!
|
Reply by Dave_CA on 1/17/08 9:20am
Msg #231033
Re: Southern CA closing statistics 2005 vs. 2007/08
Good to see that your still around and good luck with the court.
Dave
|
