Posted by Jack Tri on 7/5/08 9:16pm
Msg #254260

No Pay Signing cos.

If they still have a website.. search yahoo and google & click on website they have to pay for the clicks iam clicking away....

Reply by Michelle/AL on 7/5/08 9:29pm
Msg #254264

R Ya Still Clickin', Jack? n/m

Reply by Linda_H/FL on 7/5/08 9:31pm
Msg #254265

Ummm....correct me if I'm wrong...but

doesn't clicking improve the google rating for the website?

Reply by Michelle/AL on 7/5/08 9:48pm
Msg #254266

Hmmmm.....that would also make it all the more easier to

click, right? (smile) I just got the biggest chuckle from his posting. I can just picture him watching tv with one hand in the popcorn bowl, and the other on the mouse, clicking until the cows come home. When someone withholds your money, it does get personal. I think you're right Linda, it may improve ratings/placement on the internet but it also costs the website owner some cash. Unless, of course, they don't count reckless clicks and I may have read something about that somewhere.

Reply by NCLisa on 7/5/08 10:43pm
Msg #254269

Clicking on the Ads don't have anything to do with the

page rank in the search engine section. You have to pay for each and every click on your google ad. If it is not an ad, and just a link that came up in a search, yes, it will improve their ratings.

Reply by jba/fl on 7/6/08 12:02am
Msg #254272

Re: Hmmmm.....that would also make it all the more easier to

get carpel tunnel in his click finger...wonder which one he is using...ROFLMAO!

Reply by BrendaTx on 7/6/08 11:11am
Msg #254280

Re: Ummm....correct me if I'm wrong...but

Jack is talking about clicking the google ads that go with the website. They have to pay for the click throughs. It's a trade off. --> Giving more popularity to the site vs. depleting the advertising budget of the signing service for no good purpose of real interest by the clicker.

Think of it like this. If you click through the NNA ads constantly they have to pay for every click. I suspect this type of activity is what is causing ad publishers like myself to no longer have that little bit of income. Google is stopping the program come August.

I found it to be a good little free money maker for me. But thanks to "fraudulent" clickers the advertisers are tired of paying for the clicking through of ads that ad publishers and people like Jack are promoting.

I have never wanted anyone to click through my ads fraudulently. I knew it would cause me to lose my ad publisher status. Now, thanks to Jack@$$es clicking through ads for fraudulent purposes this is no longer a means of affordable advertising or a means for publishers to take advantage of.

Reply by MistarellaFL on 7/6/08 11:37am
Msg #254281

But IF....

he is clicking on the ads on the SS site, he is benefitting the SS...they will get PAID for the click throughs...and the payers are the companies whose ad he is clicking on.
And for the record, Jack, unprofessional, childish behavior.
I get the irritation of non-payers, I really do. But there are better ways to collect, which might yield financial results to you.

Reply by BrendaTx on 7/6/08 11:49am
Msg #254282

Re: But IF....

Yes, if the signing service is serving ads as an ad publisher.

Reply by MichiganAl on 7/6/08 2:48pm
Msg #254289

Not quite

You're talking about paid ads only, not regular links. I doubt many of them have paid Google and Yahoo ads. But if it keeps you occupied then please don't stop. It seems to be the perfect task for your mental acuity.

Reply by docs1954CA on 7/6/08 3:26pm
Msg #254291

I thought you only worked for title companies Jack???

To say your credibility is in the toilet on this site, is an understatement. Why do you persist in your moronic postings? I do admit, they're good for a laugh, and I'm not laughing with you.