Posted by jba/fl on 10/7/09 2:21pm
Msg #306488
What a day for mistakes:
I have in my hands right now a Special Warranty Deed.
The top section of the Special Warranty Deed is full of blanks - no date, no address where it asks for an address.
The notary block it was acknowledged before me this Sept 28, ____, (blah, blah, blah,) and who produced a n/a as identification.
Signed
printed
My comm. exp:_______(also blank)
WOW! Another NNA product - says so on the stamp. They must be so proud of their students!
|
Reply by PAW on 10/7/09 2:24pm
Msg #306489
Re: What a day for mistakes: OMG!!
Doesn't surprise me though.
|
Reply by Cari on 10/7/09 2:36pm
Msg #306493
as long as they get their money, they really don't care if
the notary is good or not...
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 10/7/09 2:55pm
Msg #306496
Sounds like the one I had 2 weeks ago
Jane D. Doe owns house...mother signed it over to her in 1997 in her maiden name Jane D. Smith (dtr not married at the time)....
Daughter now married and she and husband refinance (no previous mortgage on property) - title provides a new Warranty Deed for MOM to sign in name as she held title in 1997 (she's now remarried and a different name) conveying property to dtr a/k/a dtr a/k/a dtr AND THE HUSBAND....why? They need to get husband on title...and title is ticked off at ME because I added a separate acknowledgment to comply with FL law (who took title as) without their prior consent - their position is the notary block IS their domain.,..
Ugh..
|
Reply by Bob_Chicago on 10/7/09 3:04pm
Msg #306498
Am I missing something here? If mama xferd to D in 1997,
why is mama's signature necessry to add D's hubby to title. ??
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 10/7/09 3:22pm
Msg #306501
Gee...that's pretty close to what I asked title at the
time...except my words were "ARE YOU SURE??? If she signed the house over in 1997 what right does she have to sign it over again in 2009??" ... Answer? "It's a Corrective Deed" ... okay...so it should say that somewhere, right? But it didn't - no where, no how - at least not at the time it was signed two weeks ago...who knows what it looks like now..
|
Reply by GWest on 10/7/09 4:42pm
Msg #306518
Re: Gee...that's pretty close to what I asked title at the
In California I have run across this situation. If a Deed was completed transferring interest to another party and was recorded without the benefit of title insurance or by an escrow company or attorney, the Title Company may not accept the Deed and require it to be redone, or an Affidavit to be signed and notarized by the Grantor stating that they indeed signed the previously recorded Deed.
|
Reply by dickb/wi on 10/7/09 6:46pm
Msg #306537
Re: Gee...that's pretty close to what I asked title at the
that would be more proper...an affidavit and then a quit claim deed from the wife owner to the wife and husband or even a warranty deed for that matter if it would be more satisfactory to the powers that be........as posted above about the notary block IT IS NOT THE DOMAIN OF THE DOC MAKER.........it is unoquivically the domain of the Notary Public......PERIOD.......it is a notary's testimony under oath that what is in that block is the truth, and has nothing to do with the document maker......it is amazing the number of pre filled blocks that i get lately that i have to make changes to..........i think title co's and lenders need to start getting some education..sheeezzze....my .02.....
|
