Posted by pat/WA on 7/7/10 6:01pm
Msg #344042

NREIS

Anyone working for them now that they have been paying their past due invoices???

Reply by Philip Johnson on 7/7/10 6:11pm
Msg #344045

Was the stovetop not hot enough, first time around? n/m

Reply by BrendaTx on 7/7/10 6:24pm
Msg #344047

Isn't that the truth, Philip! Why would anyone

take another chance with them?

Reply by pat/WA on 7/7/10 6:28pm
Msg #344048

they are calling

and saying since they are current on their invoices can they put you back on the call list?

Reply by C. Rivera Chicago Notary Services on 7/7/10 6:42pm
Msg #344049

put you back on the call list? enjoy workin' for peanuts eh? n/m

Reply by jba/fl on 7/7/10 6:46pm
Msg #344050

Pat - someone posting today that they are not current from

March 2010. Someone else I believe said Feb. Just because they are current with you does not make them current accross the board. They are playing on your sympathy(ies). Do not fall for this.

JMHO

Reply by pat/WA on 7/7/10 6:54pm
Msg #344052

Re: Pat - someone posting today that they are not current from

I am just getting a feel for how everyone is handling this. I told them to put me on the do not call list.

Reply by jba/fl on 7/7/10 6:58pm
Msg #344053

Re: Pat - someone posting today that they are not current from

Good for you. They are too much trouble for anyone. They are involved with State of MA in court case - Msg #343931 and are losing. Those laywers are not cheap, even if they are house lawyers. So they will contract out work in the hopes they can stay afloat and live off you and I and all the other notaries who will fall for their lies and misrepresentations. They will not answer your questions either through calls or emails and everyone will just be behind the eight ball again.

Your times should be more carefree than what they will offer you.

Reply by James Dawson on 7/7/10 7:19pm
Msg #344054

Re: Pat - someone posting today that they are not current from

Not to mention the fact that if they're calling it's probably because they're worn out their welcome elsewhere!

Reply by BillyJack/NC on 7/7/10 8:32pm
Msg #344065

Re: Pat - someone posting today that they are not current from

Who said they are losing?

Reply by jba/fl on 7/7/10 11:08pm
Msg #344095

Read the link to messages and link in another.... n/m

Reply by MikeC/NY on 7/8/10 9:01am
Msg #344133

Technically they're not losing

They won in federal court, but that was reversed and remanded to the state court on appeal. That doesn't mean they're losing, only that the matter is still undecided. Since it was remanded to the state court, I'm guessing that at least part of the appeal had to do with the argument that the case should never have been tried in federal court to begin with.

I'm not defending NREIS or what they're doing - just pointing out that neither side is winning or losing at this point.

Reply by jba/fl on 7/8/10 9:10am
Msg #344140

Win or lose - no matter. My point: lots of lawyers

need lots of money. Pay for suppliers skimpier as resulting consequence.

Reply by Moneyman/TX on 7/7/10 7:27pm
Msg #344055

LMAO! "...they are current..." Thanks for the laugh, Pat n/m

Reply by chucke/fl on 7/7/10 7:29pm
Msg #344057

Re: LMAO! "...they are current..." Thanks for the laugh, Pat

Not so, Not so. They are not as current as they say. They owe me for a mod and a lot of signings dating back to March.

Reply by mwm143 on 7/7/10 9:03pm
Msg #344071

Make your own decision whether or not

to take their assignments for heavens sake!

Reply by jae on 7/7/10 10:04pm
Msg #344080

Re: Make your own decision whether or not

I have a question. Don't know exactually what the law suit incurrs, but it sounds to me like
ANY state could bring suit against any of the Title companies that we work for. If NREIS uses Notaries instead of Attorneys for closings, so does all the others. Arent' they claiming NREIS is practicing law by signing loan docs in another state? But since they don't use attorneys, they won the first suit. Now that has been appealed....right?

Reply by MikeC/NY on 7/8/10 12:41pm
Msg #344186

Re: Make your own decision whether or not

It was not the state that brought suit against NREIS - it was the Real Estate Bar Association (REBA) of MA, because MA is an attorney-only state. Since NREIS was hiring notaries to perform signings in MA, REBA is alleging UPL.

NREIS was able to get the case transferred from state court to federal court, and the federal court found for NREIS. That decision was reversed on appeal (possibly due to wrong jurisdiction, among other things) and remanded to the MA state court to be re-tried. I think that puts them back at square one, and they start all over again.

This probably would not happen in a state that doesn't have attorney-only rules (most don't). I say "probably" because there's always the chance that some notary will start giving legal advise at a signing, crossing the line into the land of UPL...

Reply by Moneyman/TX on 7/7/10 11:14pm
Msg #344096

Isn't that what everyone does in the end anyway? n/m

Reply by jae on 7/7/10 11:38pm
Msg #344098

Re: Isn't that what everyone does in the end anyway?

What do you mean? Do what?

Reply by taxpro on 7/7/10 11:50pm
Msg #344099

To take the assignment or not, n/m

Reply by K Williams on 7/8/10 9:18am
Msg #344145

I received 3 check from NREIS ang they still owe me for May and all of June They will be current when my balance with them is $0.00.

Reply by ohnotary on 7/8/10 1:35pm
Msg #344198

They still owe me 5 months back - present. We are taking them to small claims.
Hopfully that will show them how serious I am about getting my pay.

Reply by Allison_MI on 7/10/10 4:15pm
Msg #344483

Yes, i will be calling my Prepaid legal attorney also, maybe the letter I'll have them write will scare them into payment. If not, I'll pursue other matters as well.