Posted by jjill_CA on 5/21/10 10:07pm
Msg #337603
Changing the date on a jurat/acknowledgment...?
So I did a signing last Friday for borrowers who canceled part way through the signing...I had already got to some of the jurats/acks and started to fill them in before it fell apart.
I'm going back to resign them...lender wants to use the same docs. So I'm wondering if I should just line through the filled-in dates, put in the new date and initial...or attached a whole new ack/jurat?
I think I should do the later, but just thought I'd see what everyone's opinion is. I've never had that situation in my 8 years...
|
Reply by Maureen_nh on 5/21/10 10:32pm
Msg #337608
First make sure they don't expect you to backdate. Then I would print up some clean copies and proceed from there.
|
Reply by Linda Juenger on 5/21/10 11:16pm
Msg #337616
I too would re-print those and have them sign them again using the correct date. It just makes for a cleaner pkg and no one gets confused on who did what.
|
Reply by JanetK_CA on 5/22/10 1:29am
Msg #337624
Agreed.
Assuming they were edocs, that's what I'd do, too. If not, my next choice would be to swap out with the borrower's copy. If that wasn't an option either, then I'd probably make a document-by-document determination and consider who the lender was. In some cases, a correction might be preferable to adding another page and in other cases having a clean certificate would be the priority. It just a matter of personal judgment.
|
Reply by CopperheadVA on 5/22/10 6:02am
Msg #337626
Re: Agreed.
I agree with the others - all that needs to be reprinted are those particular pages with the notary certificates. I would use clean certificates as opposed to crossing out and correcting the date.
|
Reply by C. Rivera Chicago Notary Services on 5/22/10 11:55am
Msg #337675
yes, a new ack/jurat...but if these came with the packet
via edocs, just print out a new fresh set...it not use a separate one.
|
Reply by Yoli/CA on 5/22/10 12:08pm
Msg #337686
Keep it clean ... attached new ack/jurats. n/m
|
