Reply by kcg on 11/29/10 10:07pm Msg #363116
I always provide a copy of the IN tax benefit form and tell them that they need to reapply for the Mortgage Exemption. I explain what happens....current mortgage is paid off, new recorded one will go into system as a mortgage but state does not give the exemption unless it is applied for.
Some lenders and t/c's have forms in their packages, many do not. I carry a stack of the benefit form printed on gold paper and make sure I give one to every borrower. As I am reviewing docs, I explain the need to reapply.
I cannot for the life of me see how this can be UPL? Maybe someone will enlighten me?
|
Reply by ReneeK_MI on 11/30/10 5:30am Msg #363133
The info you're relaying is contained
in the Application form - you're pointing out that information, you're not interpreting laws or giving legal advice.
IMO, this wouldn't be UPL any more than providing & pointing out info on the various property tax forms that are done with a purchase (I'd venture a guess every state has some type of prop tax form on purchases, at the least). The only difference being that IN requires the application for BOTH purchases & refi's.
Once in a blue moon I get a puchase pkg that's missing the property tax forms required here in MI. I print them off the state's website with their instructions - and provide them to the buyers, point out the key info and 'help' them fill the forms out if they need me to. I 'help' them by simply reading the very fundamental questions: "In this box, it asks for your name, in this box it asks for your phone number...." Fortunately, these forms are quite simple & don't ask for any subjective answers.
I'd compare it to going to H&R Block to have an 1040-EZ done; those are done by quickly-trained lay people, not tax attorneys. It's also a tax form. They help you complete the boxes by asking you the questions ON the form. If you were to ask them "What if I don't file? What will happen?" and they said "The IRS is likely to bring about some unfortunate rain on your parade." - would that be UPL, or common-knowledge?
By comparison - I recently did a refi for CA property, and saw I think my first "Preliminary Change of Ownership" form. Daunting, to say the least - completely FULL of UPL potential. The questions are not cut/dried "what's your name" things, and would seem to carry some serious tax consequences based on the answers. I could NOT help them beyond presenting the form. My borrowers were an attorney and a financial planner, and NEITHER of them could figure out their correct answers. The attorney, frustrated, asked me "I don't know how to answer these, whom would you suggest I call?"
It was SO HARD to NOT say "I'd suggest perhaps an attorney, or a financial advisor?" =O
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 11/30/10 7:18am Msg #363144
Dennis, if this thread is an offshoot of my comment
yesterday, I apologize if I muddied the waters any - I wasn't questioning so much you providing the form, but in that thread you commented the prior notary never advised the borrower that his taxes would go up if he didn't file his exemption - it's that *advice" that I questioned as UPL. That's why I asked if it was covered under your TPL "umbrella", so to speak.
Apologies for any problems my question may have created.
|