Posted by Roadie_MD on 11/26/10 8:07am Msg #362793
loose acknowledgements
I have been noticing loose ackowldgements within the document packages. Is anyone else noticing this? If so, are you filling them out? I am hesitant to fill them out without knowing what they are going to be used for.
thoughts?
|
Reply by Lee/AR on 11/26/10 8:35am Msg #362794
You are correct. Ignore them.
|
Reply by John/CT on 11/26/10 8:35am Msg #362795
Re: loose acknowledgements ... never
Some packages include them "just in case" you fail to complete the acknowledgemnt associated with a particular document. Do I fill them out? Never!
|
Reply by A S Johnson on 11/26/10 9:01am Msg #362796
If an acknowldgement is separate, I will make sure some thing make reference to the document it goes with or I write ay the top of the acknowledgement page "Doc Ref: then the name of the document it is attached to". NEVER a loose Notary Cert/Acknowledgement with out a reference to the document it goes with.
|
Reply by MW/VA on 11/26/10 9:10am Msg #362798
I agree. Those loose acks are the equivalent of a signed
blank check. Never.
|
Reply by James Dawson on 11/26/10 9:45am Msg #362800
I make ref also because I do fill them out....some are for the "Patriot Act" form where the wording is incorrect and some are for the borrowers title, certification agreements. I fill them out, I do not staple them but I do show what Doc it references and hoe many pages.....I also draw a line across the back of the docs so the will line up when you turn them over to the blank side.
|
Reply by kathy/ca on 11/26/10 12:50pm Msg #362808
I dont get what you mean James, please explain. n/m
|
Reply by James Dawson on 11/26/10 2:28pm Msg #362813
Re: I dont get what you mean James, please explain.
>>>>>>>I make ref also because I do fill them out....some are for the "Patriot Act" form where the wording is incorrect and some are for the borrowers title, certification agreements. I fill them out, I do not staple them but I do show what Doc it references and hoe many pages.....I also draw a line across the back of the docs so the will line up when you turn them over to the blank side.<<<<<<<<<
When I have a loose certificate I take the document it is meant for and turn it over (blank side) I also turn over the loose certificate (blank side showing) and I draw a line across them laying next to each other. Therefore, you can always verify what goes with what by lining them up so the line matches.
|
Reply by kathy/ca on 11/26/10 3:17pm Msg #362814
Cool idea James, I like anything that shows we did what was
correct! Thx!
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 11/26/10 4:25pm Msg #362815
I'm not so sure lenders and title companies are too
thrilled to see their docs marked up that way...this is not something I, personally, would do ... then again, I don't normally use loose acks, especially with loan documents - I amend the preprinted one on the doc to conform to FL law.
|
Reply by James Dawson on 11/26/10 6:19pm Msg #362819
Re: I'm not so sure lenders and title companies are too
Is there guidelines for what's on the back (blank side) of Docs? I could draw a stick figure on it and it shouldn't matter.
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 11/26/10 8:17pm Msg #362839
Those documents are legal documents
You shouldn't be adding anything to them at all - except for your notary certificates...
MHO
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 11/26/10 8:19pm Msg #362840
Re: Those documents are legal documents....sorry
meant to also say - not only are they legal documents - they're not yours OR the borrowers' - no unnecessary writing or markup should be done on them by anyone...
MHO
|
Reply by James Dawson on 11/26/10 11:40pm Msg #362851
Re: Those documents are legal documents....sorry
Okay then, what about on the very edge? come one, those are not rules that apply to anything I've every heard of in California. "Legal documents should be blank on one side". ROFLMAO
|
Reply by LMS on 11/27/10 12:16am Msg #362853
Re: Those documents are legal documents
Completely agree with you, Linda!
|
Reply by kathy/ca on 11/27/10 10:22am Msg #362865
It is a cool idea when you think about it but like the other
have said, I wouldnt feel comfortable actually doing it. I always staple and if there are restrictions against stapling, I unstaple so the staple marks remain for proof.
|
Reply by James Dawson on 11/27/10 10:42am Msg #362868
Re: It is a cool idea when you think about it but like the other
Yes...everyone must establish their own comfort level.
Some even "number" their ACKs which is also cool, of course they aren't adding/changing the Docs are they? Not.
|
Reply by Susan Fischer on 11/26/10 10:44am Msg #362802
In OR, we must *attach* a loose cert, so I always staple to
doc. If the powers that be "un-attach," at least my staple holes match up.
Ignore extras in packages.
|
Reply by GOLDGIRL/CA on 11/26/10 12:03pm Msg #362805
Re: In OR, we must *attach* a loose cert, so I always staple to
Good idea, James, with the lines on the back!!
Also, ALWAYS staple the LL to the doc. Even if you have to unstaple it before you send it back because of some rule by the lender/TC that they don't want anything stapled. That way when they call to say you never sent an ack/jurat (because they it lost as a result of their staple prohibition) at least the staple holes will be there as proof you did it.
Ignore the extras in the package unless you need them as LLs, which is why they are in there in the first place, I assume. If you don't need them, save them for later use!
|
Reply by James Dawson on 11/26/10 12:29pm Msg #362807
GoldGold ...a loose cert, so I always staple to
Another thing Goldgirl.....that are "outdated" anyway. The notary's name is supposed to be printed under the signature line and they often don't even have space for it.
|
Reply by Yoli/CA on 11/26/10 1:49pm Msg #362810
Re: GoldGold ...a loose cert, so I always staple to
Just curious, James, where is stated that "the notary's name is supposed to be printed under the signature line?"
I haven't seen that on the SOS website. Is this something new I missed?
|
Reply by James Dawson on 11/26/10 2:12pm Msg #362812
Hey Yoli ...a loose cert, so I always staple to
First of all....usually in the closing instructions LOL BUT honestly citimortage, Schwab (which is a majority of what I do) all address that issue. I'll look one up and send it to you. Hope you had a wonderful thanksgiving!
|
Reply by Stephanie_CA on 11/26/10 5:13pm Msg #362816
James - I'm not awarethat Notary's name is supposed to be
printed under sig line. Where in the California notary Public Handbook which covers all California notary Law did you come across this tidbit of info. Thank you in advance for a response. Stephanie
|
Reply by James Dawson on 11/26/10 6:21pm Msg #362820
OP addresses loose certificates, not me n/m
|
Reply by Yoli/CA on 11/27/10 11:19am Msg #362872
Stephanie - I asked the same thing.
James sent me pm and email with attachment in response. Seems one of the ss he works with has this requirement on their instructions and James has simply continued it on his other assignments.
|
Reply by Lavergne Manuel on 11/27/10 12:16pm Msg #362873
Re: Stephanie - I asked the same thing.
This may have been mentioned by someone else since I didn't read the whole thread but if I have to use a loose acknowledgment, I lay the acknowledgment and the document it is to be used with side by side and use my embosser where half is on the acknowledgment and half is on the document so it has to match. You can do this at the top as well as at the bottom or any place that you can reach with half of the embosser on one page and half on the other.
|