Posted by Ilene C. Seidel on 2/15/11 7:37am Msg #372798
Acknowledging a witness
I had a general notary job in Florida last week, no instructions but to acknowledge the signer. I didn't look at the other acknowledgements since (I thought) they didn't apply to me. Then I get a phone call I was supposed to acknowledge the witnesses too. Has anyone had this request? In my 20 years I've never heard of notarizing a witness signature.
|
Reply by James Dawson on 2/15/11 7:45am Msg #372799
Some states are "witness" states some aren't, no never heard of your scenario before.
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 2/15/11 7:50am Msg #372802
Re: Acknowledging a witness...was it a will? n/m
|
Reply by Ilene C. Seidel on 2/15/11 10:50am Msg #372826
Re: Acknowledging a witness...was it a will?
no a deed transferring property
|
Reply by CopperheadVA on 2/15/11 8:02am Msg #372805
I've only seen that on the self-proving affidavit that usually accompany wills here in VA. But on that document, the witnesses signatures are usually notarized within the same notarial statement as that of the will-signer.
|
Reply by PAW on 2/15/11 8:36am Msg #372806
What type of instrument?
As discussed already, SP Wills often require sworn statements of the witnesses and often an attestation by them as well as the testator. There are other instruments that require the witnesses signature to be acknowledged depending on the purpose and drafter of the instrument. (Advanced healthcare directives comes to mind.)
|
Reply by FlaNotary2 on 2/15/11 8:47am Msg #372812
The only document I know of that requires this is the
self-prooving affidavit used on wills, which requires the acknowledgment of the testator, and the oaths of the witnesses.
However, I have come across documents that were drafted to include the acknowledgment or oath of the witnessses, even though it isn't required (deeds, marital settlement agreements, POAs, etc.). Obviously, this disqualifies the notary from also acting as a witness. Pain in the butt? Sure. But there isn't really any harm in it. If it asks for the witness signatures to be notarized, I'll go ahead and do that.
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 2/15/11 9:02am Msg #372815
May not be a Florida-specific form
It's possible the document drafter requires the additional acknowledgements...
|
Reply by Ilene C. Seidel on 2/15/11 10:51am Msg #372827
Re: May not be a Florida-specific form
Linda I don't think the company that drafted the document knew what they were doing.
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 2/15/11 11:00am Msg #372831
I think I agree with you Ilene...
Deeds of conveyance in FL require two witnesses (notary can be one) - does not require that witnesses' signatures be notarized, at least not that I'm aware of - unless, as I said, it's the drafter's requirement/request.
|
Reply by Ilene C. Seidel on 2/15/11 11:07am Msg #372833
Re: I think I agree with you Ilene...
Thanks Linda
|
Reply by PAW on 2/15/11 12:31pm Msg #372843
Maybe commercial property?
On all commercial property transfers that I handled back when I was brokering small commercial loans, the deed and mortgage required all parties, including the witnesses, signatures to be acknowledged. This was the lender's decision (required by the underwriters), not a state requirement. So there ended up being 5 signatures minimum on every deed and mortgage: grantor, grantee, two witnesses and the notary.
|
Reply by Linda_H/FL on 2/15/11 12:33pm Msg #372844
Re: Maybe commercial property?
Back in the old days, huh Paul??...<<ducks and runs>>...
|
Reply by PAW on 2/15/11 12:54pm Msg #372849
Yup!
Back in the "good ol' days" when you could actually make a living brokering and closing loans.
You may run, but you can't hide ... If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck ...
|
Reply by Les_CO on 2/15/11 9:00am Msg #372814
Yes, I have, on wills. n/m
|
Reply by BobbiCT on 2/15/11 11:18am Msg #372835
The better questions ...
1. Did the company put in their Written instructions that you were to identify and take the acknowledgment of witnesses that they "watched" or they "signed as witnesses"?
2. Did the company provide a notarization block for a "witnessess signature acknowledgment"?
If they didn't do at least #2, then I feel it is their problem for not providing the notarization block that the recipient wanted for witness acknowlegements. They should pay you to go out for the re-sign ... since the signer will also have to re-sign in front of the witnesses.
I never heard of or saw a witness notarization acknowledgment block on any deed.
|