Posted by Baragona/MO on 2/11/11 3:21pm Msg #372402
Adobe Reader X
...is worthless to those of us with dual-tray printers. It has a known issue where it will not print the bottom third of legal pages when printing mixed packages. Thus, it is a completely useless upgrade for signing agents. Do not upgrade to Adobe Reader X. If you have, better uninstall and then reinstall 9.4. Figure it is good to put this topic up now so it can be searched for easily later.
|
Reply by jba/fl on 2/11/11 3:30pm Msg #372403
This has been discussed, but reminders are good.
I would bet that some have already forgotten. And we know how people don't like to use the orange search button for anything.
|
Reply by JanetK_CA on 2/11/11 3:38pm Msg #372406
Thanks! And re: using orange search button
This is also a good reminder to think about what to put in the subject line when responding to or starting a thread. Hopefully most know that when we do a search, we have a choice of searching the subject line only (the default) or searching the content of a message. I'd venture to guess that most people just go with the default. (I know I usually do, unless I'm not finding what I'm looking for.)
If we all do a better job of putting in the subject line words that people are likely to search for (like the name of a company we're posting about, for example), we will all get better results from future searches.
|
Reply by Baragona/MO on 2/11/11 3:43pm Msg #372408
Re: Thanks! And re: using orange search button
Exactly! That is why I posted this topic as I had a bit of an issue finding what i needed using the search button. I found my information and it was helpful, but a topic like this can use an easily searchable subject line. 
|
Reply by PAW on 2/12/11 9:30am Msg #372493
Re: Adobe Reader X ???
I totally disagree. I have been using "X" for quite some time and do not have any problems printing mixed documents. I know there have been many reported problems of this nature, and Adobe is aware of it (don't know if it have been addressed in the newly released version (10.0.1.434) or not).
So I think it a bit brash to unequivocally denounce the use of Reader X by everyone.
|
Reply by Pam/NM on 2/14/11 9:43am Msg #372664
Re: Adobe Reader X ???
I went to Adobe's forum to look for a fix and wasn't unable to find one. I have noticed it only occasionally, and not even on all docs in a single package. It must have something to do with the way the file is prepared. The screen image shows everything, but last week I had signature lines on both note and TIL in one package. Paul--do you know of a fix? Or do I need to uninstall and go back to 9.4?
|