Posted by Stephanie Santiago on 9/14/11 3:49pm
Msg #397362
Statement and confirmation of statement validity.
Okay, I'm in California
1 Deed of Trust:
4 Signers:
All 4 signers are identified with a California Driver's License
4 Entries on Journal
I do not see any unlawful reason that I cannot use 1 Notarial certificate with the names of the 4 signers that appeared before me, proving on the basis of satisfactory evidence that they are who are named in the document.
All 4 signers will be appearing before me at the same time with a CA Driver's License so I can identify each signer.
Please give me some feedback.
James - if you are on this site, please comment.
Thank you,
Stephanie
...sorry for any typos
|
Reply by Stephanie Santiago on 9/14/11 3:57pm
Msg #397366
Statement and confirmation of statement following CA Notary
Law.
|
Reply by Bee_CA on 9/14/11 3:59pm
Msg #397367
Re: Statement and confirmation of statement following CA Notary
Absolutely you can use one acknowledgement.
|
Reply by Stephanie Santiago on 9/14/11 4:13pm
Msg #397372
Re: Statement and confirmation of statement following CA Notary
Thank you Bee
|
Reply by Notarysigner on 9/14/11 4:05pm
Msg #397369
Sounds Okay to me......so far. Question, Does the Deed of trust have all four names on the same page? If so, then yes.
I'm sure you'd have to modify the notarial Certificate to accommodate all of the names.
|
Reply by Stephanie Santiago on 9/14/11 4:12pm
Msg #397371
DOT has all 4 names - Attorney modifying acknowledgement...
I have a request to complete 50 Deeds of Trust in the same manner.
Thank you James
|
Reply by Notarysigner on 9/14/11 4:37pm
Msg #397376
Re: DOT has all 4 names - Attorney modifying acknowledgement...
Fifty deeds for the same four people, no problem. Fifty deeds for 200 people (4 X 50) could be a problem if they all show up at the same time to sign your journal. Hehe!
|
Reply by John Tennant on 9/14/11 4:52pm
Msg #397379
200 entries including fingerprints in your journal
That will eat up a lot of pages.
|
Reply by Stephanie Santiago on 9/14/11 5:03pm
Msg #397381
True John, but I do always follow CA notary Law.....
The Modern Journal of Nortarial Events that I purchased from this site will make it a little easier.
All of the Signers know that I DO NOT take shortcuts so they plan on meeting with me for a long time.
|
Reply by Stephanie Santiago on 9/14/11 5:00pm
Msg #397380
James - it will be a long day. All 4 will be meeting with me
to take care of the 50 DOTs.
|
Reply by Claudine Osborne on 9/14/11 8:54pm
Msg #397412
Re: James - it will be a long day. All 4 will be meeting with me
Stephanie
|
Reply by Claudine Osborne on 9/14/11 8:54pm
Msg #397413
Hit the post key too quickly..N/M n/m
|
Reply by LKT/CA on 9/14/11 9:16pm
Msg #397416
You can create the notarial certificates in a Word doc, type everything and then print the 50 copies. Print 5 extra copies"just in case". Then all that is need on the certs is your signature and stamp - that parts easy.
The way I save time multiple journal entries is to enter the signers names for EVERY notarial act. BUT....I only complete the redundant info (i.e. address, date/time/fee of act, ID info, etc.) ONCE. Later, I go back and fill in the redundant info. For example, if I were notarizing 10 docs for Jane Marie Doe, the entries would look like this:
1st entry: Jane Marie Doe
1234 Main St
Supertown, USA 98765
Date: 9/14/11
Time: 3:00 pm
Fee: $10
ID Info: <whatever it is>
Type of doc: <whatever it is>
Check box for type of notarial act: Ack
Entries 2 thru 10 would only have Jane's name, type of doc, type of notarial act. Jane would provide a signature for the 10 notarial acts. The redundant info (i.e. address, date/time/fee, ID) gets filled in later. You could do the same with your 200 journal entries.
|
Reply by Priscilla Witman on 9/15/11 9:39am
Msg #397432
And I thought 22 journal entries in one day was a lot!!
|
Reply by Stephanie Santiago on 9/15/11 10:14am
Msg #397437
Re: Statement and confirmation of statement validity...:) n/m
|
Reply by Stephanie Santiago on 9/15/11 10:14am
Msg #397436
Lisa - thank you for the suggestion.... n/m
|
