Posted by Mia on 3/12/12 3:15pm
Msg #414643

Possible work for Ohio Notaries....

** WARNING - If you don't like the words "Men's Reproductive Health or Sex" then
Don't click on the Link**

Ohio Notaries may have to notarize signatures on Affidavits if this Bill passes.

"Bill introduced to regulate men's reproductive health"

http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/dayton-news/bill-introduced-to-regulate-mens-reproductive-health-1341547.html

..

Reply by GOLDGIRL/CA on 3/12/12 3:50pm
Msg #414646

Well....

... since "transvaginal" has now become part of the American lexicon, thanks to the VA Legislature, I can't imagine anyone being offended by the relatively tame "Men's Reproductive Health or Sex" (except maybe men).

In any case, I wouldn't hold my breath if I were an Ohio notary as far as getting more work, cos this bill likely will never pass. (Tho ya never know!) In any case, once all these fight-back bills hit the airwaves, we could move this discussion to JP!

Reply by JanetK_CA on 3/12/12 6:21pm
Msg #414661

Re: Well.... Maybe that should happen now!

Ladies (i.e. Susan and Mia), as you both well know, one of the reasons the JP page was begun was to keep the vitriol off this page. Susan, I do think you may have jumped the gun on assuming Mia's intent with posting that message and Mia... My goodness, the venom was practically dripping off the page - and I thought it was uncalled for, even if Susan jumped to conclusions.

In spite of what happens "over there", please try to take postings on this page at face value, however difficult that might be. We can all agree or disagree on any topic - and we do on nearly every post. But it's not that hard to make your case about the issue(s) as hand without getting personal or assuming intent not in evidence. Really..., it isn't!

Reply by Mia on 3/12/12 8:24pm
Msg #414671

Re: Well.... Maybe that should happen now!

Janet, just go over to JP and read Susan Fischer' posts, then read the responses.
You will see a trend.
My OP was benign -- I had no hidden agenda.
There was absolutely no reason for her (Susan Fischers) response -- other than to be
argumentative. She didn't care about the content of my post, all she cared about was
to stir up trouble (which is her MO).

Reply by Susan Fischer on 3/12/12 10:45pm
Msg #414685

Thanks for the reminder, Janet. My apologies to all for

adding my afterthought. It was not appropriate, and I'm sorry.

I stand by my (non-parenthetical) professional statement as a Notary Public regarding Notarizing, not analyzing.

Again everyone, I'm sorry for crossing the line.

Reply by BrendaTx on 3/13/12 7:14pm
Msg #414828

Nicely said and well done, Susan. n/m

Reply by Susan Fischer on 3/12/12 4:37pm
Msg #414654

A Notary's job is to correctly Notarize a signature

not analyze the document's "political," or cultural origin.

[It is not a political issue, Mia, it's an Affidavit - akinto the permission slips women had to get from their husbands to get tubal ligations. It's the insertion of legislators into the privacy of the doctor/patient examination rooms, regardless of sex. Doesn't society think both the men AND women should be as healthy as possible?]

Reply by Mia on 3/12/12 5:57pm
Msg #414656

As usual Susan Fischer, you have it wrong

Now read really slow..... this is what I said.
"Ohio Notaries may have to notarize signatures on Affidavits if this Bill passes"

And, I did NOT make this a Political issue. This was just an FYI to Ohio Notaries.
So, you don't need to worry about it Susan Fischer, now run along and try to
start trouble somewhere else.

Reply by Linda Spanski on 3/12/12 6:40pm
Msg #414664

spewing hate = bad for business n/m

Reply by Buddy Young on 3/12/12 9:49pm
Msg #414674

Re: spewing hate = bad for business

Now, Now ladies.

That's why my posts are usually one sentance or less. I get in less trouble that way.

Reply by HisHughness on 3/13/12 12:14am
Msg #414692

Issues pertaining to reproduction and contraception are currently among the hottest political topics.

Legislation is introduced in every state legislature every session that requires the execution of affidavits. There appears to be no reason to single this one out for mention here except for its political implications.

Given Mia's history in this forum of enthusiastically applauding those of her political persuasion who have posted political matter here, it is a logical conclusion that this is of the same genre.

Politically oriented material belongs in Just Politics. This thread is an excellent example of the vitriol that characterizes that forum, and is a harbinger of what will occur here if political posts continue.

Reply by bagger on 3/13/12 10:40am
Msg #414721

Who owns this board?
Harry or Hugh?
Once again Hugh takes an issue that pertains to our business and turns it into politics!
Reference msg 413437 where Hugh takes the word CAMERA and turns it into CONSERVATIVE.
Seems to me that Freedom of Speech applies to only one person in Austin, and those that agree with him.

Reply by HisHughness on 3/13/12 12:58pm
Msg #414757

Unfortunately, neither literacy nor reading comprehension is a requirement for posting to this board, a fact that some posters' offerings continue to drive home.

For those who have not read it, Message #413437 was a tongue-in-cheek post poking fun at myself for obsessing on political posts in this forum. The subject of the post had nothing to do with politics.

Much like some people's posts have nothing to do with common sense.

Reply by Mia on 3/13/12 6:15pm
Msg #414822

Well then...

If "politically oriented material belongs in Just Politics", then we will have
to take all the "Discuss Work" posts to JP.
ALL Notary Public Laws come from State (Political) Legislation..........


..