Posted by pat/WA on 7/6/13 10:21am Msg #475776
double signature lines
Just printed documents for a signing this morning. some of the documents have four signature lines with borrowers names printed under them. There are only two borrowers. Do I ignore the second set of signature lines, have the two borrowers each sign twice or line through the extra signature lines and have the borrowers initial? Any other ideas?
|
Reply by walthtz on 7/6/13 10:24am Msg #475777
The extra lines are in case there are more than 2 BR's on the loan.
|
Reply by pat/WA on 7/6/13 10:41am Msg #475780
The four signature lines have the two borrowers names printed under them.
|
Reply by ananotary on 7/6/13 10:24am Msg #475778
Absent getting specific instructions to ignore the 2nd set
I would never line through and ignore them. JMHO
|
Reply by Susan Fischer on 7/6/13 10:29am Msg #475779
Sounds like a boilerplate form that the program just
had to "complete". I always just did the one-line thru & initial thing, since one signature per BO is the SOP.
jmho
|
Reply by ToniK on 7/6/13 10:53am Msg #475781
is it in a Trust? n/m
|
Reply by pat/WA on 7/6/13 11:01am Msg #475783
Re: is it in a Trust?
no
|
Reply by LKT/CA on 7/6/13 10:59am Msg #475782
Is one signature line their name (as an individual) and the other with "Trustee" after it? I'd contact the TC......some don't like strike-outs. If you cannot reach the TC, then I'd have them sign twice - probably an error to have two signature lines for each borrower (as individuals). Personally, I have never run into a problem with a borrower "over-signing" but it could be a problem if they under-sign. Make NO assumptions about the docs. Contact the TC first. JMHO
|
Reply by MW/VA on 7/6/13 11:11am Msg #475785
IMO it's a question for your hiring party. n/m
|
Reply by pat/WA on 7/6/13 11:34am Msg #475788
Re: IMO it's a question for your hiring party.
Hiring party puts you on hold and after around 10 minutes hangs up. It is a holiday weekend. I will use my own judgment.
|
Reply by Bear900/CA on 7/6/13 11:30am Msg #475786
Have them sign it!
You're following the docs. It's not going to hurt. Too much is better then too little. JMHO
|
Reply by Luckydog on 7/6/13 11:40am Msg #475789
Re: Have them sign it!
If their name is typed or printed, I have them sign. I have seen this before, better to sign it then to leave it empty or strike out. Most of the times it involves a trust, but I have seen it the same printed twice for no apparent reason. I just have them sign it.
|
Reply by pat/WA on 7/6/13 12:41pm Msg #475790
You are right
This was not a trust but I had them sign it twice anyway and they were very nice and understanding
|
Reply by JanetK_CA on 7/6/13 4:47pm Msg #475802
Re: You are right
For future reference, what you could do in a situation like that is make an extra copy of that page. Have borrowers execute one exactly as shown and another (if they're willing) as you think it probably should be. That way, the client can choose what they prefer and shred the other. (Might be a concern, though, with two signature pages of a Note.)
A situation like that could mean many things... a computer glitch, a goof by someone new, or just a different way of doing things for reasons we may not understand. But when you can't reach your client, interpreting what you think should be done can get you in trouble. Barring other options, I believe the safest thing is to go with exactly what you see.
|
Reply by MW/VA on 7/6/13 6:29pm Msg #475811
That's probably the best suggestion, Janet. That way alla
the bases are covered & there's no chance of having to re-sign.
|
Reply by pat/WA on 7/6/13 6:57pm Msg #475817
Re: You are right
The note wasn't one of the documents. I don't believe I would have considered having the borrowers sign two notes
|