Posted by BrendaTx on 9/17/13 8:56pm
Msg #484891
Notary Acceptor
Two years ago, I posted a message about how many notaries are doing this kind of work. It is ridiculous...they are everywhere.
What kind of document scam are they getting themselves into?
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 9/17/13 8:57pm
Msg #484892
Oh yeah, context:
I have been asked again to act as an notary acceptor...that's what stirred up my hornets nest.
|
Reply by LKT/CA on 9/17/13 9:32pm
Msg #484894
Re: Notary Acceptor....what is "accepted"? n/m
|
Reply by docs1954CA on 9/17/13 10:07pm
Msg #484895
Msg #155995..2006
|
Reply by PRnotary/WA on 9/18/13 9:44am
Msg #484920
See message #305864 n/m
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 9/18/13 9:52am
Msg #484923
Re: See message #305864
Thanks.
I can think of very few situations in which I would be willing to deal with this type of work. The time involved could become rather tedious if you are working for a problematic person. To date, Acceptor Seekers are problematic, in my experience.
|
Reply by BrendaTx on 9/18/13 9:46am
Msg #484922
There's just no way to deal with seekers of Notary Acceptors
I declined.
He said, "So you are saying that there is no such thing."
I explained that it was not an official notary capacity called "notary acceptor"...wasn't in our laws or handbooks.
It ticked him off.
He said, "WE'RE DONE!! I need a knowledgeable notary!!"
|
Reply by Notarysigner on 9/18/13 10:27am
Msg #484926
I think he was looking for someone to handle protest! n/m
|
Reply by Susan Fischer on 9/18/13 10:54am
Msg #484927
Per Pamela of CA's post 156029: "... but it gives them an
opportunity of having an impartial third party, an officer of the court, to 'tell their side of the story to' if they are sincere in wanting to settle the matter..."
Notaries Public are officers of the state - not officers of the court. Big difference. Lawyers are officers of the court by virtue of being authorized to appear. Lay people, like CASAs, are officers of the court by virtue of being Court Appointed Special Advocates.
Notaries, as witnesses in court, are not officers of the court, regardless of our mandated impartiality. Making up a fancy-sounding 'capacity' to sway a potential "client" into settling? Bleah.
I'm with you, Bren - I wouldn't pet that dog either.
|
