   | | Political discussion involving past and present political events, candidates and elections. Please read Msg #1 before posting. |
Msg #83997
0 replies | SB 357 | By Mike Goodey on 10/31/25 3:56pm
Back in 2022 Representative Scott Weiner of California, pushed our governor to sign this bill that would repeal police officers from rounding up groups of women they felt were about to conduct prostitution. The bill did not allow police to profile black, brown or transgenders because of how they dressed.
This impeded the officers from finding minors used for prostitution, especially because of the heavy makeup and wigs that were worn. This is happening on Figueroa street in Los Angeles.
According to Sargent Navarro, a 20 year veteran, drug dealers could make as much as $12,000 a night but they sell drugs and buyers are gone but with girls there are always those who come back to get more.
New York Times magazine reporter Emily Baum Gaertner Nunn did a piece on this ever increasing problem and reported that, with the budget cuts from the governor's and mayor's offices, sex trafficking officers have diminished from six to one. That is certainly too much for one officer to be accomplish such a large criminal endeavor.
Navarro says that many of these sex workers are 12 and 13 years old. She works out of the 77t street division. Don't forget Joe Biden allowed open borders which brought sex traffickers into our country.
The ACLU backed this bill because they didn't want profiling of certain groups of women.
Looks like the extreme left are not concerned with child prostitution.
|
| Msg #83988
5 replies | Prop 50 | By Mike Goodey on 10/26/25 5:18pm
Please understand what prop 50 is for. It's the liberal left's idea to grow their seats in congress by redesigning territories in their favor.
Talk about rigging elections: Newsom and Obama have told lie after lie in their campaign to get voters to pass prop 50. Why would AOC and senator Warren get involved in this that concerns California voters? It's the radical left's wish to rig an election.
VOTE "NO" ON PROP 50!!!!!
|
| Msg #83986
4 replies | Nearly 300 FBI agents mixed in the Jan 6 crowd, encouraging | By Moneyman/TX on 10/23/25 1:07pm
... people to enter the capital through broken doors and windows. One agent is on video ripping out the glass from a window then stands back trying to get people to enter the building (entrapment?). When no one right around him would take him up on his offer to get in the building that way, and he noticed someone had a camera recording him, he then starts claiming that someone else broke the window and starts telling people "don't go in there, it's against the law". That POS didn't realize that the camera had been on him for a while. That is some of the video that Dems refused to release to the public after Jan 6. It took Republicans gaining control before we could see it for ourselves.
FBI Director and top officials, at the time, lied to Congress about even having any agents in the crowd. People have been seeing video of some people whipping up the crowd, encouraging them to damage federal property and other illegal actions; in several of the private citizens' videos, every single person seen in the video BESIDES the person promoting the riot (illegal) behavior was found by the FBI and charged. Remember how the FBI eagerly announced it used facial recognition to find them? The agitators, some in clear view on a few of the videos I have seen, were never "found" by the FBI, nor were they charged, and their names have never been made public by the FBI (because, as we now know, they were government agents).
So, our government, under the Biden Administration, places undercover (or "plain clothes" -- FBI's own term it used to hide the fact they were even there) agents in the crowd for the purpose of promoting the crowd to riot and preform illegal acts, lie to Congress and the American public about what really happened. When their actions are made public, earlier this year, NOT A SINGLE WORD FROM ANY DEMOCRATS? To be honest, not nearly enough from Republicans either, although, at least many of them did acknowledge the illegal and unconstitutional actions of the agents, the FBI, Biden DOJ and many government agents.
Then there are the reports of some Dems, on record, who were hiding and would not even come out for capital police when they were clearing the building prior to there even being a single sign that protesters would become violent. They claimed that they thought the capital police who came to their office to clear them out were the rioters looking for them. Only, the capital police were clearing the building at least an HOUR BEFORE any rioters had even gotten near the building due supposedly to another safety threat that had nothing to do with the peaceful protest going on outside. Interesting that these certain Democratic elected officials somehow knew that there would be a "riot" and people would be in the capital going into elected officials offices -- for at least an hour before -- there was even a sign that the crowd might turn violent.
AOC is just one who is on record, by her own words & by her own timeline, which shows that she somehow knew "rioters would breach the capital and be in the hallways" at least an hour before the government says the rioters even pushed passed the OUTTER barricades police established (not even on the steps of the capital at this point). At least an hour before anyone, an FBI agent ? or the firsts rioter ?, even tried to breach the actual capital building, AOC claimed she was hiding because she was afraid of the "rioters" and what they might do to her. Again, at that specific time, there was not a single rioter, only protesters, some of who turned into rioters at a later time.
I am a little surprised that no one mentioned anything about it when this scandal came to light about a month or two ago.
With so much apathy, and the fact that it was the FBI, I'm not holding my breath that anyone will actually be held accountable or that such blatant abuse of power and illegal actions by our government agents would actually lead to either deserved jail time and the total restructuring of the FBI.
I am sure that much more will be brought out to the public over time. However, just as with cops, lawyers, DA's, and politicians, when it comes to right and wrong, they all seem to cover for other bad actors in their profession (because as soon as they cover for them, they too are just as guilty). I would be surprised if anyone who should, actually goes to prison for what they have done, and are still doing, to our country. It's amazing, if the scandal is large enough and must be hidden from the public, that is one of the rare times that we can count on our elected officials to set party issues aside and work together to cover each others A$$. They all know that if they protect their bad acting co-workers today, then, later when they need covering, the others will protect them as well; as long as what they did "is too big for the American public to know about".
|
| | Msg #83974
0 replies | Awesome | By Mike Goodey on 10/14/25 4:50pm
What a wonderful and whole hearted acceptance speech Erika gave for the medal of freedom award given to her husband, posthumously, Charlie Kirk.
As usual Donald Trump gave credit for his own many accomplishments, but his peace deal with Israel and Hamas is beyond reproach. Even as a Trump supporter I get tired of him continuing to bring up what he has accomplished. This was about Charlie Kirk and his fearless devotion to advocate for Jesus and for freedom and truth.
I believe like others that Charlie had no idea how much larger Turning Point USA would become after his death.
|
| Msg #83972
4 replies | She thinks it is political | By Moneyman/TX on 10/14/25 5:44am
... in 2025, but in 2019 it couldn't possibly have been just political (even when the politicians made up new "laws" & new statute of limitations; and everyone involved told the court under oath no one defrauded anyone, no one received any "unfair advantage" unlike what,clearly, the publicly available fraudulent paperwork already shows, so far, happened under the current laws on the books in this 2025 case).
(about 50 seconds long) http://youtube.com/shorts/9yzDDphMz3w?si=VTgqa81Wly9WRUHq
And she still does her show with a straight face expecting people to trust her and her network to be "the honest" media outlet.
When your "outrage", "facts", and/or if something is right or wrong depend only on * who * rather than * what * someone actually did, or did not do, you, and the company that hires you can't be trusted to have the ability to tell the truth about what day of the week it is.
|
| | Msg #83968
0 replies | common sense | By Mike Goodey on 10/10/25 9:20pm
It's very nice to see that the Kern county school district has decided that only girls can play in girls sports.
|
| Msg #83957
11 replies | Two interesting takes on the FCC's use of power. | By SC/CA on 9/20/25 12:58pm
Granted Ted Cruz’s concern about the FCC’s threats (which are illegal and against the Constitution), is because he thinks (rightfully so) that it essentially turns the FCC into a political weapon (a classic Trumpian move), which will then be used by the democrats (maybe, maybe not) when they hold the power in the White House.
While I don’t agree with Cruz on most things, he’s right that Trump has turned the FCC into a political weapon, which he fears will swing in the other direction. The politicization of the FCC is a good example of how Trump has turned our democracy, and its institutions, into weapons to further his need for personal power.
It’s worth noting that Cruz is the chairman of the US Senate Committee of Commerce, Science, and Transportation; which oversees the FCC.
http://www.cnn.com/2025/09/19/politics/ted-cruz-fcc-abc-mob
Some excerpts and quotes from Ted Cruz:
“He (The FCC Chair) says, ‘We can do this the easy way, or we can do this the hard way.’ And I got to say *says Ted Cruz, that’s right out of ‘Goodfellas.’ That’s right out of a mafioso coming into a bar going, ‘nice bar you have here. It’d be a shame if something happened to it.’”
Cruz later added: “I think it is unbelievably dangerous for government to put itself in the position of saying, ‘We’re going to decide what speech we like and what we don’t, and we’re going to threaten to take you off air if we don’t like what you’re saying.’”
If more corporations were to stand up, as the video below suggests, it would be a step in the right direction.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/all-9-justices-against-maga-censorship-if-abc-defends-kimmel-1st-am-attorney-melber-s-report/vi-AA1MVs1X?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=LCTS&cvid=68cecf859ca7493788d8950c146cafac&ei=11
It would be nice if someone were to say, “Hey let’s not turn the FCC, or any of our federal institutions or programs, into political weapons - because it’s illegal, unethical, and against the Constitution and the foundation of our democracy.“ - and do something about it.
|
| Msg #83953
4 replies | Forgiveness | By Mike Goodey on 9/18/25 12:55pm
In light of Charlie Kirk's assassination I truly reflect on posts I have written.
I have used names like Newscum and shifty Schiff to refer to governor Newsom and senator Adam Schiff and I truly regret that name calling. Obviously I used the names that Trump uses and it is dead wrong.
I ask all of you whether conservative or liberal to please forgive me for what I have done and I ask for your forgiveness.
It says in the Bible that If those who forgive will be forgiven but those who do not forgive will not be forgiven. I ask that all of you have a blessed day!
|
| | Msg #83949
1 replies | More lunacy for california | By Mike Goodey on 9/6/25 12:52pm
Those of you that have daughters or granddaughters: The school counsel in Temecula, CA. is about to implement a plan that requires girls in junior high and high school to fill out a mental health form if they refuse to allow male genders to use their bathrooms and/or locker rooms.
The form is referred to as the " Mental Health accommodation Request form." This is the accommodation request: I am requesting a mental health accommodation on behalf of my child.This request is made in accordance with federal and state laws, including Section 504of the Rehabilitation Act, the individuals with DisabilitiesEducation Act (DEA) and California Education Codes.
Please describe the mental health condition and the nature of the accommodation being requested (e.g. diagnosed anxiety, PTSD, etc.)
If available, please attach supporting documentation (e.g. medical diagnosis, 504 Plan, counseling records, etc.)
I understand that my child may be eligible for accommodations through a 504 Plan or other support services, and that the school will collaborate with me to identify appropriate options to support my child's well-being.
All this because a female doesn't want to have a male share and expose themselves in a locker room or bathroom!
This mental health form may follow a female all through her career especially trying to apply for a security clearance. (gun permit)
I know Janet has replied about the reading she has done on hormones and chromosomes, so are you saying that God made a mistake? Really?
|
| Msg #83942
5 replies | AB 495 | By Mike Goodey on 8/31/25 6:10pm
The lunacy of the liberal California government bewilders my wife and I. After going through both houses this bill was to be presented to governor Newsom to sign into law on Sept. 19th. On the 18th the bill was put on hold. Thankfully thousands showed up on that Tuesday to protest the governor's signing of that bill.
If you have not heard, according to some of the most prestigious law firms, that Ab 495 is so vague that it allows anyone (ANYONE) to download a form on a computer, fill out a child's name and go to the school and take that child out of school with no ID shown or request from a parent. The school does not need to ask for anything as long as the form is filled out.
I understand that Celeste Fernandez, (D) from San Fernando intended this bill to protect illegal immigrant children from being taken away but again I bring up the fact that it is too vague. What about school children who are citizens? They need protection too!
It reminds me of Nancy Pelosi telling congress to just vote on Obamacare and when it passes, THEN you can read it.
We are all for protecting our school children but this bill lacks good judgement.
I hope and pray that governor Newsom has the wisdom to veto this bill.
|
| | Msg #83938
0 replies | “I’m also proud of those of us who stood up...” | By SC/CA on 8/27/25 2:21pm
“I’m disappointed but not surprised,” Case said, adding that she was aware of at least six other FEMA workers who received similar emails. “I’m also proud of those of us who stood up, regardless of what it might mean for our jobs.
The public deserves to know what’s happening, because lives and communities will suffer if this continues.”
The “Katrina Declaration” letter warns that critical reforms enacted after the failed response to Hurricane Katrina are being unraveled, as the Trump administration moves to either abolish or drastically shrink FEMA’s role.
The move echoes actions taken earlier this summer, when the Trump administration suspended roughly 140 employees from the Environmental Protection Agency days after they signed a public letter raising concerns about the treatment of federal workers and the Trump administration’s regulations on climate and public health.
http://www.cnn.com/2025/08/26/politics/fema-workers-administrative-leave-katrina-declaration-trump
“The Katrina Declaration is a recent letter from FEMA employees expressing concerns about cuts to disaster preparedness and response capabilities, issued just before the 20th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina.
Context and Purpose
The "Katrina Declaration and Petition to Congress" was released on August 25, 2025, by a group of current and former employees of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This declaration aims to raise awareness about significant reductions in funding and staffing that could hinder the agency's ability to respond effectively to disasters. The letter emphasizes the need for reforms to restore FEMA's capacity to manage emergencies and support local responders.
Key Concerns Raised
1. Staffing Reductions: The declaration highlights that one-third of FEMA's full-time staff left the agency in 2025, which has severely impacted its operational capacity.
2. Funding Cuts: Employees criticize recent cuts to essential programs, including the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) and the National Fire Academy, which are vital for disaster preparedness.
3. Delayed Responses: The letter cites specific instances, such as delays in responding to flooding in Kerrville, Texas, where mission assignments were reportedly held up for up to 72 hours, affecting the agency's ability to assist during emergencies.
Political Interference: The declaration also addresses concerns about staff being reassigned to other federal agencies, such as ICE, and the impact of political decisions on FEMA's effectiveness.
Call to Action
The employees hope that their warnings will prompt Congress to take action to prevent a repeat of the failures experienced during Hurricane Katrina. They argue that without adequate support and resources, the agency's ability to respond to future disasters is at risk, potentially endangering American lives and property.
This declaration serves as a critical reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by disaster response agencies and the importance of maintaining robust support for emergency management initiatives.”
|
| Msg #83937
1 replies | Wow! Just Wow. | By Roadie_MD on 8/27/25 2:16pm
I am an occasional reader of the forums on NR. Clicked on the Just Politics tab to see what was being discussed--what a joke! No real dialog, primarily CA lefties spreading TDS and hate. And the choir chiming in as expected.
If I was interested in this BS I would just go on Facebook. Anger makes you ugly. It's going to be a long 4 (hopefully more) years for you.
Have a nice day all.
|
| | | | Msg #83914
3 replies | We’re being groomed to hate. | By SC/CA on 7/29/25 2:16pm
Prolific and profitable fake news sites and podcasts (and many other organizations like Qanon, and normalizing hate groups, etc) are monetizing hatred. We target the “others.” Kill the programs that help the “others” (and we’re all the others). Even if it affects us personally - we don’t care, because we hate them so much.
We’ve been told for years, repeatedly, from many sources (even if it isn’t real) how horrible “those” people are. We are bonded by our joint hatred. Our very identity depends on it. We form unions, allies, and friendships – all with the common theme of hating the others.
Working together toward finding solutions is unimaginable. Finding strength in our differences and seeing common ground is unimaginable. Seeing any solution at all, with those people – is beyond me.
It’s a marketing scheme gone rouge. We get our information from hatred hawkers rather than from verifying facts. Facts have no bearing on my decision making. And don’t try to tell me otherwise, because I won’t listen, nor do I care about so-called facts because I don’t trust you, or anyone else. I’m living in a pile of mistrust manure. Critical thinking and facts are gone and have been replaced by pure hatred and fear. I need to blame others, always.
We’ve been told that we cannot trust the others, that we cannot trust our government. We fear them and want them gone. Our decisions and actions are based on fear, hatred, and mistrust. We certainly cannot even think that we can work with them – the others. They are evil, subhuman, and will surely go to hell- or at least I pray that they do, to my God the only God, not their God who is evil. Destruction and death are the only solutions.
We must kill the government, banish the people. And blame the others. If I cannot blame the others or destroy something, what will I do? Find solutions? Take responsibility? Trust someone who has a different opinion? Suspend judgment of the others? Dream on! ROTFL.
|
|
|
