But Ralph, I don't see why I would want to keep you all in business, taking almost two months to pay me, asking me to let you do an autopsy on my very being, and keeping most of the notary fee.
You must be marketing to the fresh new group of notaries who don't know any better. I do know better, and many on this board know better.
We've been raped, pillaged and slaughtered by the middle man signing service, and I for one, am not interested in working for a low ball fee for all the effort, diligence and professionalism I bring to the table, and then wait 60 days to be paid. Unless of course your company really does come through with payment, no bad checks, no frivolous and whimsical deductions to my agreed upon fee, etc. I am paid in 1 to 5 days working for title and escrow directly. No 35 pp contract is required. I don't see why I would want to finance your enterprise.
I'm pretty sure your business model is based on "volume" with your clients, that we've been there done that scam.
We completely understand your business model, I am confident you will do well because I think about many of the notaries out there don't know their craft or their worth (these are the notaries you are clearly targeting) and would rather sit around and wait for the phone to ring for skim milk, peanut butter and jelly offers. I prefer cabernet, steak and lobster.
Does your 35-pp contract offer even a smidgen of privacy protection for all the PPI you are requiring notaries to hand over? We're all a little weary of divulging our entire PPI open to ID theft, and when you go out of business, is our information thrown into the dumpster. What is our privacy protection guarantee when you discard notaries from your active list?
Are your people background checked? I'm pretty sure you, like many before you, haven't done your own due diligence on staffing. Here's a classic example, ACCURATE NATIONAL SIGNINGS, owned by a known convicted ID thief whose business records are where TF. We have no clue. She and her hubby shagged 40 notaries for over $40K. We're sick of being taken advantage of and keeping the middleman in biz.
So pardon me for my skepticism and diligence in protecting and furthering the profession of signing agents.
Why are you data mining NR's population, since you've been in business for 9 years?
This board is a lot smarter today than in the past.
Good luck in your endeavors.
Personally, if I were so valued to you as your partner, you would pay be appropriately and more timely than you propose.
|
Messages in this Thread |
| Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - Cheryl Elliott on 10/1/14 8:25am |
| Did you notice on their website!!! - bagger on 10/1/14 8:29am |
| Re: Did you notice on their website!!! - Cheryl Elliott on 10/1/14 8:42am |
| Re: Did you notice on their website!!! - supersigner on 10/2/14 4:18pm |
| Yes, several errors. Fee now upped to compensate as you know - jba/fl on 10/1/14 8:56am |
| Re: Did you notice on their website!!! - sheltn on 10/1/14 9:08am |
| Re: Did you notice on their website!!!PEANUTS - sheltn on 10/1/14 9:15am |
| As independent contractors, we can always say NO!! n/m - JanetK_CA on 10/1/14 3:21pm |
| Re: Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - Les_CO on 10/1/14 9:51am |
| Re: Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - Cheryl Elliott on 10/1/14 10:02am |
| About those directions on what-how-when-where-who - Linda_in_IN on 10/1/14 10:14am |
| Re: About those directions on what-how-when-where-who - Notarysigner on 10/1/14 10:40am |
| Me either, James. ROFL! Good spam control...yea!! n/m - jba/fl on 10/1/14 10:46am |
| Linda-ha ha all my beer cans get tossed on the car - Darlin_AL on 10/1/14 11:30am |
| Ignore them. Maybe they'll go away.............. n/m - Jack/AL on 10/1/14 1:56pm |
| Re: Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - Katmet on 10/1/14 4:51pm |
| Beer cans?!?! What shall I do w/ the wine bottles?? n/m - HrdwrkrVA on 10/1/14 8:52pm |
| Re: Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - Perez - Ralph on 10/1/14 9:14pm |
| Appreciate your time and effort in responding to my post - Cheryl Elliott on 10/1/14 10:11pm |
| Re: Appreciate your time and effort in responding to my post - John Tennant on 10/1/14 10:42pm |
| Re: Appreciate your time and effort in responding to my post - Perez - Ralph on 10/1/14 11:47pm |
| "VALUED SIGNING PARTNERS" - BearPaw/CO on 10/1/14 11:24pm |
| Re: "VALUED SIGNING PARTNERS" - Perez - Ralph on 10/1/14 11:48pm |
| Ralph, please address the concerns expressed by JanetK n/m - Stoli on 10/2/14 10:51am |
| Re: "VALUED SIGNING PARTNERS" - Notarysigner on 10/2/14 11:05am |
| Re: Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - JanetK_CA on 10/2/14 12:32am |
| Re: Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - Perez - Ralph on 10/2/14 12:33am |
| Re: Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - Doris_CO on 10/2/14 1:01am |
| Re: Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - Cheryl Elliott on 10/2/14 4:13am |
| Re: Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - Cheryl Elliott on 10/2/14 4:20am |
| With all due respect, Mr. Perez... - parkerc/ME on 10/2/14 7:56am |
| Re: With all due respect, Mr. Perez... - Perez - Ralph on 10/2/14 10:52am |
| my sources show you are a management consulting firm.. - Notarysigner on 10/2/14 11:18am |
| Only one person on entire "meet or team" is a notary n/m - Notarysigner on 10/2/14 12:46pm |
| Re: Only one person on entire "meet our team" is a notary - jba/fl on 10/2/14 1:42pm |
| True but you don't even have to take a exam to - Notarysigner on 10/2/14 2:17pm |
| Re: Only one person on entire "meet our team" is a notary - Les_CO on 10/2/14 5:18pm |
| Why are you jumping on me? - jba/fl on 10/2/14 5:55pm |
| Re: Why are you jumping on me? - Les_CO on 10/3/14 3:04am |
| Thanks, Les. n/m - jba/fl on 10/3/14 7:50am |
| Well one is better than none....maybe? n/m - Les_CO on 10/2/14 1:45pm |
| Re: my sources show you are a management consulting firm.. - Perez - Ralph on 10/2/14 5:54pm |
| I didn't publish the address on purpose...nice house! n/m - Notarysigner on 10/2/14 7:43pm |
| Mr. Perez, kindly respond to our privacy concerns - coastal/CA on 10/2/14 11:20am |
| Re: Mr. Perez, kindly respond to our privacy concerns - Aida Gonzalez on 10/2/14 11:46am |
| Re: Mr. Perez, kindly respond to our privacy concerns - jba/fl on 10/2/14 2:07pm |
| Re: Mr. Perez, kindly respond to our privacy concerns - John Tennant on 10/2/14 2:29pm |
| Re: Mr. Perez, kindly respond to our privacy concerns - JanetK_CA on 10/2/14 3:28pm |
| Re: Mr. Perez, kindly respond to our privacy concerns - VT_Syrup on 10/2/14 3:37pm |
| Re: Mr. Perez, kindly respond to our privacy concerns - JanetK_CA on 10/2/14 5:33pm |
| Re: With all due respect, Mr. Perez... - Les_CO on 10/2/14 11:20am |
| As a PS - Les_CO on 10/2/14 11:53am |
| Re: As a PS Ditto! n/m - Notarysigner on 10/2/14 12:01pm |
| Also...why can't your co. be added to SC in all 50 states? - Lee/AR on 10/2/14 11:36am |
| Re: With all due respect, Mr. Perez... - Aida Gonzalez on 10/2/14 11:39am |
| Interesting research. - John Tennant on 10/2/14 1:02pm |
| Re: Interesting research. - stell/IL on 10/2/14 1:13pm |
| Re: Interesting research. - John Tennant on 10/2/14 1:21pm |
| And I got it - and I'm NOT in SnapDocs. n/m - Linda_H/FL on 10/2/14 1:27pm |
| Re: And I got it - and I. Ditto 4 me n/m - parkerc/ME on 10/2/14 1:40pm |
| I get stuff from Snap Docs but was going to ask here, Who - jba/fl on 10/2/14 1:52pm |
| Re: I get stuff from Snap Docs but was going to ask here, Who - jba/fl on 10/2/14 1:55pm |
| Re: I get stuff from Snap Docs but was going to ask here, Who - Notarysigner on 10/2/14 2:05pm |
| Re: I get stuff from Snap Docs but was going to ask here, Who - jba/fl on 10/2/14 2:11pm |
| Boohoo! I didn’t get their offer...just commenting. n/m - Les_CO on 10/2/14 1:40pm |
| Re: Interesting research. - jba/fl on 10/2/14 1:48pm |
| Re: Interesting research. - Aida Gonzalez on 10/2/14 2:04pm |
| Re: Interesting research. - John Tennant on 10/2/14 2:10pm |
| What REGULATION requires BGC every year? - FGX/NJ on 10/2/14 4:24pm |
| Re: What REGULATION requires BGC every year? - Linda_H/FL on 10/2/14 4:35pm |
| Re: What REGULATION requires BGC every year? - FGX/NJ on 10/2/14 4:40pm |
| heh :) n/m - Linda_H/FL on 10/2/14 4:48pm |
| Re: What REGULATION requires BGC every year? - Perez - Ralph on 10/2/14 6:04pm |
| Re: What REGULATION requires BGC every year? - Perez - Ralph on 10/2/14 6:17pm |
| Ralph, I've been fairly silent so far...but I would - Linda_H/FL on 10/2/14 6:22pm |
| I should add here I suppose that yes, I did join your - Linda_H/FL on 10/2/14 6:25pm |
| Re: I should add here I suppose that yes, I did join your - Perez - Ralph on 10/2/14 7:12pm |
| Re: Ralph, I - Perez - Ralph on 10/2/14 6:53pm |
| Re: Interesting research. - Perez - Ralph on 10/2/14 6:00pm |
| Re: Interesting research. - John Tennant on 10/2/14 9:32pm |
| Re: Interesting research. - Jeff Green on 10/14/14 11:04am |
| Delayed responses - Perez - Ralph on 10/2/14 7:17pm |
| Re: Delayed responses - Marian_in_CA on 10/3/14 12:25am |
| Ralph, As an IRS Enrolled Agent I can provide - John Tennant on 10/3/14 12:51am |
| Re: Delayed responses - jba/fl on 10/3/14 8:19am |
| Re: Back to those 35-page middleman SS vendor packages - Perez - Ralph on 1/16/15 9:15pm |