Why did CFPB delay TRID — and how are loan origination systems preparing?
Legal experts and loan origination system representatives talk about preparation for TRID
Amy Swinderman Amy Swinderman amyswinderman@yahoo.com Jun 25, 2015
After the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) decided to delay implementation of a new rule that will affect the homebuying process, many industry players wondered what was behind the decision.
The CFPB had remained insistent that the Aug. 1 implementation date of its new TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures (TRID) rule would remain, despite pleas from trade associations to either delay the rule or implement a “hold harmless” period.
Earlier this month, the CFPB pushed back the implementation date from Aug. 1 to Oct. 1, then Oct. 3, claiming that an “administrative error” was responsible for the delay.
Some in the industry, however, are skeptical that all of this has happened due to a simple administrative error. The CFPB made its “administrative error” announcement on the same day that Ellie Mae, whose mortgage management software is used by a large majority of the nation’s small and midsized banks, released an update incorporating TRID support in its Encompass software.
That left less than two months for Ellie Mae users to deploy and test the updated software. At the same time, some sources told Inman that other software used by some of the top mortgage lenders and settlement agents in the country “blew up” last week.
Marx Sterbcow
Marx Sterbcow
“Someone at the CFPB didn’t drop the ball in making this ‘administrative error,’” said Marx Sterbcow, managing attorney of the Sterbcow Law Group LLC in New Orleans, and a nationally recognized RESPA attorney.
“Instead, they clearly knew the consequences for pulling the ‘administrative error’ card at this point, and that’s because they received firm and concrete information that several loan origination systems (LOSs) would not be ready by the Aug. 1 deadline. They were so vocal about not delaying this rule that any move contrary to their public position would seemingly undermine their credibility for future regulatory implementations.”
The CFPB seemed to acknowledge those concerns by saying, “The bureau has learned that delays in the delivery of system updates have left creditors and others with limited time to fully test all of their systems and system components to ensure that each system works with the others in an effective manner.”
“The CFPB clearly received enough credible information from the industry that many LOS systems wouldn’t be ready by Aug. 1, and if the rule stayed in place, there would many communities across rural America where consumers might not be able to attain a mortgage because their local lending institution was out of the residential mortgage lending business due to software glitch issues,” Sterbcow said.
“For a rule that has been this controversial and the consistent message of ‘no delay,’ the bureau found a way to keep their credibility while at the same time preserving the mortgage industry until this software and integration issue is worked out. There are LOS systems that are ready, though.”
One company that says it its LOS is ready is Calyx. Joan England, senior director of sales and marketing for the mortgage origination software provider, told Inman that the company released an update to its Point system on May 30 to a select group comprising about 20 percent of its clients.
“We knew there would be adjustments and tweaking, because there is no way you can test for every single thing, especially since this is a brand-new process,” England said. “We know we have updates to do, and we have that in our schedule.”
TRID delay: “There is no way you can test for every single thing, especially since this is a…
CLICK TO TWEET
Calyx plans to release two more updates at the end of this month and at the end of July, England said.
“We almost wish there wasn’t a delay. We feel like we are ahead of the market since we have already released a TRID-ready version of our software, even if it needs to be updated,” she said. “So it’s business as usual for us.”
England said some of the concern regarding software issues has to do with the fact that if a company starts a loan application the day before the implementation deadline and another application the next day when the rule takes effect, the company will, for some period of time until both loans close, have to run two different processing systems concurrently.
“That’s always a challenge when working with any kind of software,” England said. |
