Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the


Re: To further explain
Posted by Yoli/CA of CA on 4/29/19 9:32am Msg #605959
Perhaps someone can 'splain this to me. I went to their website and all I got from it is that they're a platform. No where did I get the impression that Notarize is "the" notary public. My perception is that they will put the hiring party in touch with a notary from their network.

Maybe I haven't had enough coffee this morning. Imo, that company is acting very much like a SS with additional services -- ID verification, document upload, live video connect with notary. Unfortunately, SSs are not regulated.

I'm very much against RON. However, from what I read and imo, I don't think they are violating CA 8227.1.

California does require in-person appearance. Live video is not allowed. California does require the notary to examine and certify to the identity of signer when presented with satisfactory evidence. Imo, someone/something else verifying the ID does not fulfill that requirement. But, these are California requirements for California notaries. Perhaps the other states that have passed RON don't have these requirements. And, as someone else posted, Federal law provides for states to accept notarizations from other states if they are in compliance with the original state's laws.

jmo

PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message


Messages in this Thread
 Notarize in violation of CA Gov Code section 8227.1 - Matt Miller on 4/28/19 1:05pm
 I'm on your side, but it can be argued that a notarization - Lee/AR on 4/28/19 3:51pm
 IMO it doesn't benefit anyone to be critical of the VA law. -  MW/VA on 4/30/19 8:46am
 If memory serves, companies like Notarize got onboard after - Lee/AR on 4/30/19 9:56am
 That's what I remember, too, and I agree! n/m -  JanetK_CA on 5/1/19 3:51pm
 I - Lee/AR on 4/28/19 3:55pm
 Agree with Lee/AR; And some thoughts on what we do... -  JanetK_CA on 4/28/19 7:36pm
 Re: And I agree with you on what we should do - Matt Miller on 4/28/19 8:38pm
 Sorry, but I think this is a bit of a reach - Linda_H/FL on 4/28/19 6:38pm
 Re: To clarify - Matt Miller on 4/28/19 7:28pm
 I disagree. -  JanetK_CA on 4/28/19 7:42pm
 Re: To further explain - Matt Miller on 4/28/19 8:30pm
 Not to hijack this thread .... - BearPaw/CO on 4/28/19 8:54pm
 Woops. Meant: JB piggybank n/m - BearPaw/CO on 4/28/19 8:58pm
 Re: I understand where you're coming from but... - Matt Miller on 4/28/19 9:02pm
 Re: To further explain - Yoli/CA on 4/29/19 9:32am
 Re: To further explain -  JanetK_CA on 4/29/19 2:55pm
 Re: To further explain - LJCA on 4/29/19 6:39pm
 Excellent & VERY interesting links, LJCA n/m - Lee/AR on 4/30/19 7:00am
 That's it exactly, Linda. I'm not a fan, but it seems -  MW/VA on 4/30/19 8:48am
 Re: Notarize in violation of CA Gov Code section 8227.1 - Matt Miller on 5/1/19 11:57am
 Re: Notarize in violation of CA Gov Code section 8227.1 -  JanetK_CA on 5/1/19 5:25pm
 Re: Notarize in violation of CA Gov Code section 8227.1 - Matt Miller on 5/3/19 9:36am



 
Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
 
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2024, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.