Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the


Absolutely agree.
Posted by  BrendaTx of TX on 2/14/16 1:19am Msg #545954
For what it's worth, laws in both Texas and Pennsylvania require that certificates of acknowledgments must be substantially in the form of the certificates provided by the respective states.

California acknowledgments are substantially the same as many other states' forms of acknowledgments, but certainly not all.

Amending the certificate language that isn't substantially the same is an alternative to automatically attaching a loose certificate. It saves paper and maintains the accuracy of the recording fee stated on the settlement statement / closing disclosure.

In Texas, $4.00 is added to the recording fee and can't be passed on to the borrower/buyer as a closing cost. (In California, the extra page causes an additional $3.00. In Florida, the amount jumps by $8.50 for an additional page.) That amount has to be absorbed by the title company as a cost of using a signing agent.

(Once a notary attaches an acknowledgment, the unused acknowledgment really can't be removed because most notaries indicate the number of pages in the document on the attached certificate and the page count includes the original unused certificate.)
PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message


Messages in this Thread
 CA Notaries: Signing in PA for a CA second home. All docs - snowflake/PA on 2/13/16 9:22am
 Re: CA Notaries: Signing in PA for a CA second home. All docs -  Cheryl Elliott on 2/13/16 9:36am
 Re: CA Notaries: Signing in PA for a CA second home. All docs -  VT_Syrup on 2/14/16 6:25am
 I would say.... - notarydi/CA on 2/13/16 9:41am
 Re: I would say.... - snowflake/PA on 2/13/16 9:45am
 Re: I would say.... - Marian_in_CA on 2/13/16 11:40pm
 Both notarydi/CA and Lee/AR are correct -  Yoli/CA on 2/13/16 12:04pm
 Excerpt from CA law re Acks - Lee/AR on 2/13/16 9:45am
 Re: Excerpt from CA law re Acksn- YES, Lee/AR! -  JanetK_CA on 2/13/16 10:36pm
 Also run past the hiring party n/m -  HARRY_PA on 2/13/16 10:14am
 Just do it according to PA law.... - Marian_in_CA on 2/13/16 12:07pm
 As I understand it, you MUST staple… -  Stoli on 2/13/16 1:15pm
 Sorry.. Marian, not Marion n/m -  Stoli on 2/13/16 1:16pm
 Re: CA Notaries: Signing in PA for a CA second home. All docs - Belinda/CA on 2/13/16 3:50pm
 Not ridiculous for me. -  BrendaTx on 2/13/16 8:24pm
 "except" didn't belong in that last sentence. n/m -  BrendaTx on 2/13/16 8:25pm
 abide by your state guidelines.......:) n/m - notarydi/CA on 2/13/16 9:34pm
 Absolutely agree. -  BrendaTx on 2/14/16 1:19am
 Re: Absolutely agree. - LKT/CA on 2/14/16 4:15pm
 Respectfully, I'm more of a problem solver. -  BrendaTx on 2/14/16 5:55pm
 Re: Respectfully, I - LKT/CA on 2/14/16 7:22pm
 True! Totally agree. n/m -  BrendaTx on 2/14/16 7:27pm
 Re: CA Notaries: Signing in PA for a CA second home. All docs - Belinda/CA on 2/15/16 6:33pm
 Re: CA Notaries: Signing in PA for a CA second home. All docs - Joe Ewing on 2/14/16 6:17pm



 
Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
 
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2024, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.