... IMO, Lizza, and The New Yorker, planned and executed little more than a Hit Piece on Trump, via a Dishonest Hit Piece with no real journalistic ethics behind the written article, or the promotion of, the vastly skewed and biased article on Scaramucci's comments.
Ryan Lizza, AND The New Yorker, took his comments out of context and falsely created the context and the imagined (out of control) "rant". Listen to a version without the "bleeps" and you will hear what appears to be a conversation between two people who could be standing at the water cooler in an office, or 2 people dining at a restruant in public without drawing any attention to themselves as they are speaking. In an actual, unaltered, audio of the conversation you can hear both of them laughing at times, expecially after the "Bannon" comment (again, BOTH of the laughed).
The words are from Scaramucci's mouth, however, CONTEXT, is something any cub reporter should be able to understand as something that cannot be skewed for the reporter's own agenda, not if that reporter should ever be allowed to be taken seriously by anyone in the future. Lizza could have written his article honestly with Scaramucci's words and the tone of their conversation in true context and probably still have caused Scaramucci just as many problems (maybe/maybe not ending in his firing for the actual words alone?).
|
