It does what it can to protect Democrats, even claiming something is "mixture (of true/false)" as they did in the link you provided. Although, if you read their "What's True" and "What's False" sections carefully on the linked page you can see the bias and the outright falsehood Snopes is using in an attempt to protect Gore. Snopes says that Gore did made such claims (i.e. 100% true), then they attempt to say that it wasn't really him, but that it was others which he "in some cases erroneously" had quoted regarding the claims. Really? He made the claims but misquoted some "others", so claims that he made the statements are considered "mixture"??
Here is a report for background (with links within the report to sources referenced in the report) on why Snopes cannot be trusted:
http://newspunch.com/snopes-caught-lying-for-hillary-again-questions-raised/
(I especially like how they point out that Snopes changes the claim they are "fact checking" to defend against a claim that no one is making, thus the "False" or "Mixture" labels appear to be legit)
"The Daily Mail Snopes Story And Fact Checking The Fact Checkers"
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/12/22/the-daily-mail-snopes-story-and-fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/?sh=1f93c59f227f |
