Posting here due to one "indisputable" finding of the case involving these "legal" scammers was:
- Some attorney signatures were used on documents without their authorization (in attempt to make service look legal)
Thought this was noteworthy in view of the recent discussion of signing notarized docs in advance. I want to make it clear that to my knowledge my commissioning State makes no comment on whether a document can/should be signed "for clerical purposes" beforehand; their concept of what we do is en masse. That said . . .
NO NEED for policing of any kind on this (recommendations are not Regulations); however, I conclude that in the minds of <some> signers, a document may not seem "legal" or duly ratified (lol) if they don't witness it sealed/validated by the Notary signing BEFORE THEM!*
*As for my reviewing all notarial elements In Their Presence, they need never know I do a Final check when I leave!
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2016/09/ftc-action-court-orders-ban-mortgage-relief-scammers-mortgage |
