Boosting a company's praises just out of the blue tends to have a negative impact on the said company. AA is top notch through and through and doesn't need anyone posting anything here enforcing such, especially when nothing bad has ever been posted on the forum about AA to defend, and the few negative comments in SC are not taken seriously. They are not in need of notary's to work for them being or brought up here in the forum, but maybe OP had a reason for doing so and would like to hear why that is.
BP is known in the past for her snarky and personal attacks when very uncalled for and taken totally out of context.
I have an idea... let Doris defend herself if she thought she is misunderstood and BearPaw take a seat. I am sure Doris is a fabulous NSA just as the rest of us are here.
Maybe Montana and Corpjen have a reason for posting as they did, let's see if they will come back to explain.
Buzz words as "disgusting", "lies", "ozzing"," imaginary", "poor taste", "bad judgment", "crude" and "illiterate" are not necessary for a professional scenario and sort of reflects back on the poster.
It's been really nice these past few weeks... let's try and be civil and not jump to assumptions, conclusions and be so ugly towards others just because you have a difference of their opinion. My opinion is very different from yours, yet I am keeping it professional addressing this. Ugly, grapghic, depictive words are not necessary here.
I think this needed to be addressed and we can stay on track here like we have been since Valentines Day when the last negative entity has been terminated. jmo
|
