http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/explosive-devices-found-in-mail-sent-to-hillary-clinton-and-obama/ar-BBOPm1p?li=BBnb7Kz
Devices were intercepted. However, intent was there, mechanisms were there, capability was there.
Is it more of an "assault" when great bodily harm and/or property damage is intended and possible? Is it an "assault" if the only possible outcome is public embarrassment? Would the latter instead be reclassified ... maybe "public outcry?" |
