I thought I'd share this with you. Yesterday a person called me asking if I do notary protests. I told him that I am somewhat familiar with the process and that I could not give legal advice. Due to the fact that I am not an attorney, I told him that I felt uncomfortable doing the protest.
It turns out that the person was an attorney and only needed a notary public to notarize the affidavits he had drawn up on his own. Given this, I agreed to notarize the documents he had. When the guy arrived I asked to see his bar card. I wanted to make sure he was legit. Thankfully, he was.
It turns out that the attorney is trying to null and void a contract he has with Ameriquest. What I don't understand is that the Massachusetts Attorney General, as well as numerous other states, have filed a lawsuit against Ameriquest. Wouldn't the lawsuits possibly bankrupt Ameriquest thereby deleting the need to pursue any type of protest, etc.?
Why would the attorney need a protest to cancel an unfair contract? |