"For all that we know..."
Those are very important key words that often come just before a pundit, politician, random blogger (or billionaire 'influencer') says some kind of wild accusation, conjecture, or untruth. It should be a red flag for whatever comes after that phrase.
Another trick some use is to ask a question implying some falsehood without actually stating it (e.g. "What if..."). They strongly infer the lie while carefully parsing their choice of words so they can maintain deniability. Technically, they haven't actually claimed the misstatement to be true (they just asked a question, after all), but they've accomplished their purpose and left people believing it's so. If there were any truth or evidence behind the implication, it would have been provided, although some *claim* proof without ever giving any specifics that would allow it to be verified.
This is all probably a waste of time, but just in case, here's (hopefully) an article about "baloney detection" from a brilliant thinker (who is sadly long gone) whom I've admired since my early college days:
http://getpocket.com/explore/item/the-baloney-detection-kit-carl-sagan-s-rules-for-bullshit-busting-and-critical-thinking?sponsored=0&position=11&scheduled_corpus_item_id=d4638c12-3561-4ee6-9cf7-897721a73c4f
Cable TV and social media are full of examples of all the "pitfalls of common sense" listed there from Mr. Sagan's book... 
|
