| I've been contemplating posting this message, but after having read Harry's post regarding the NNA, I decided to go ahead and do it! I am registered with many signing companies. When registering, most only wanted to know what experience I have in the industry and some wanted me to additionally take a short test to affirm my knowledge. Some; however, will not post me or use me over a "certified signing agent". So my lead to this post is this... Does a "certified signing agent" make him/her more qualified and experienced than a "hands-on", experienced person who has spent years either taking signings or in the industry as an escrow person? I think not! I personally spent 18 years in the escrow industry and suffered through four low interest rate crazes. I've sacrificed blood, sweat, tears, (literally) and my life to meet the demands of lenders and realtors. Now that I'm performing signings (for the last 2 years), I'm not as qualified as a so-called CSA, who, in some cases, has no where near the knowledge-base that I have? These companies keep saying they want qualified, knowledgeable people and I'm sure that most CSA's are qualified and knowledgeable, but that doesn't make them the ultimate choice in every situation. I have refused to become certified because I feel that if my knowledge and experience doesn't count for something with a company, then I don't want to work for them. Besides, why would I want to spend my hard-earned money to further line the pockets of one of these so-called "get certified" companies, when I've already paid my dues to this industry!!! On a side note.. I have had the pleasure to work with many wonderful companies who do take into consideration experience and not whether or not you're certified. Thanks for letting me vent! |
