My guess is that she sent it to several regular posters on this forum. BUT, if she could PM us, I don't understand why she couldn't PM to Pam - unless she's been blocked (which I'm not even sure is possible on this site), or her reasons for not being able to weren't the same as stated, or she's just making that up. For the record, I did copy and paste the entire message and sent it via PM to Pam. I haven't received any confirmation that it went to her, nor have I received a notice that it wasn't able to be sent. (She may not have set up notifications to her email for PMs.)
Regardless of the above, I wasn't thrilled at being thrown into the middle of this, which brings us back to my question of potentially questionable motives. Is the message sender possibly trying to polish her image to posters on this forum whom she may perceive as 'influential', for lack of a better term? (She did refer to the posts about her here.) For the record, as I told Pam in my PM, I've never had any business relationship with any of the entities involved in this issue, beyond having my (long outdated) profile show up on that site. If I happened to sign up there of my own volition (which I suppose is possible), I don't remember doing so - and I have no record of a user name or password for that site.
Pam, the bottom line is that I'm sure we all hope that you end up receiving all the funds you're owed. Please let us know if that happens.
|
