"For the typical loan signing the fees we charge are less than if we multiplied the maximum per-act fee by the number of acts, but that might not always be the case."
Even here where we can charge $15 per signature, that's frequently not the case for me. Plus, for real estate related transactions, my fees aren't based at all on number of notarizations. I think you'd be right if just talking about GNW, but when we're doing a loan signing (or seller pkg), we're doing more than just notarizing. As you know, fees are nearly always quoted as a flat fee for the entire transaction, regardless of what's involved. Even if no documents are printed, we're still facilitating the signing, which involves lots of documents that don't need notarizing. And except in those states you referred to that restrict travel fees, going to their location is also not directly or exclusively related to completing a notarial act.
Further, providing a physical device and data stream to connect to access to the document(s), just like printing docs, is not an inherent part of completing a notarial act - so far, at least.  If a notary traveled to someone to do a GNW notarization, I'd assume the signers would be using their own equipment and data.
I believe this same kind of discussion has happened here several times in the past about printing. That's how I see it, at least. So I stand by my recommendation that we shouldn't reduce fees for e-signings just because there's no printing.
|
