Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the

Something missing from RULONA for oral oaths?
Posted by  VT_Syrup of VT on 7/3/20 10:30am Msg #621681
The Uniform Law Commission's version of the Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts may be found at

I was trying to figure out what my options are for administering a purely oral oath or affirmation, with no written document, during the pandemic. (I looked at the Vermont version too, but I'm linking to the national recommended version since this forum covers the whole US.)

I cannot find any provision that requires the person taking an oath or affirmation to appear before the notary AT ALL, regardless of whether your thinking of physical appearance or online appearance!

Section 5 says a person must appear, and be identified, for acknowledgements, verifications, and signature witnessing. Verifications are oaths or affirmations where the affiant states the contents of a document are true; if there isn't any document, it isn't a verification.

Section 6 states "If a notarial act relates to a statement made in or a signature executed on a record, the individual making the statement or executing the signature shall appear personally before the notarial officer." So if there isn't any record, section 6 doesn't apply.

My guess is that they wanted to limit the personal requirements to certain notarial acts. Some acts, such as making a certified copy, or noting a protest, traditionally did not require personal appearance, so the Uniform Law Commission didn't want to change that. I think when they were deciding which notarial acts DO require personal appearance, they just forgot about oral oaths.

Here's an example of an oral oath that is likely to come up for me in the next few months. Mrs. Doe, who is 85 years old and afraid of getting COVID-19, appears by video conference before the Castleton Vermont Board of Civil Authority, complaining that the town's assessor has set the value of her property too high, so she will have to pay more property tax than she should. Before the board lets her state why she things the value is too high, the board wants to put her under oath, as they always have. So does the absence of an explicit personal appearance requirement in RULONA mean a notary on the board can place her under oath by video conference?
PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message

Messages in this Thread
 Something missing from RULONA for oral oaths? -  VT_Syrup on 7/3/20 10:30am
 Sec 6 says making statement OR executing signature -  sigtogo/OR on 7/3/20 11:04am
 Re: Sec 6 says making statement OR executing signature -  VT_Syrup on 7/3/20 11:35am
 I didnít interpreted that way VT -  sigtogo/OR on 7/3/20 11:44am
 Re: I didnít interpreted that way VT -  VT_Syrup on 7/3/20 12:07pm

Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2020, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.