I agree, Mike. This one shows not only the lack of any opposition research at all from the Democrats, but also shows just how little research the vast majority of voters actually do before they vote for someone. The Republican Party doesn't appear to have done much vetting themselves either in this case.
Although he does appear to be little more than an exceptional con-artist, since the voters actually voted for him, can anything really be done? I mean, as far as I know, he doesn't have any legal issues that would prevent him from actually seeking, or serving in, the office; so far, I believe all of his lies have been prior to him taking office.
Wouldn't he have to actually do something while IN office in order for him to be thrown out? I'm not sure, but it would seem that if the House could throw him out even before he took office, wouldn't that be something akin to denying the voters their choice of representative that they dully elected?
IMO, he IS the best example of that old saying; We get the government we deserve (at least for the voters who voted for him) |
