are two different things.
the responses here are fantastical conspiratorial thinking. try a little imagination and empathy.
Imagine: it's 2am, you are home alone, asleep. You are awakened by a large man wielding a hammer demanding to know where your spouse is. Are you going to start screaming, and likely be killed, or try to think of a way to defuse?
For an 82 yr old awakened in the middle of the night to think of ways to get the intruder to allow him into the bathroom where his phone is and be able to call 911 is pretty astute thinking and action. Using calm voice when making the 911 call in hopes the operator (who probably should be fired) would catch on to something bad happening was probably his best bet for surviving the ordeal. Screaming to the 911 operator would also likely have gotten himself killed.
offering to wait for Nancy to return, again, was buying himself time while waiting, praying for police intervention.
Who knows why he had a drink of some sorts in his hand? You certainly don't. Maybe, he was offering the guy a drink to defuse and distract.
As. far as knocking on the door. It happened and is on video. How the police could not know they were at Pelosi's house is a mystery. How much of their actions were led by the 911 operator? definitely seems to be a need to evaluate how they responded and why.
When the door was opened, how would it have helped for Pelosi to start yelling for help. the guy is holding his hand and arm raised, ready to strike. The police apparently tried to also defuse by asking him to drop the hammer. seems they were slow to act but hard to conclude with what little we know and the time from door opening to Pelosi being struck is only a few seconds.
smiling? seriously? that is fear you are seeing and everyone exhibits it differently.
|
| Messages in this Thread |
|  I love it when a conspiracy theory is thoroughly debunked - MikeC/TX on 1/27/23 6:00pm |
|  Coincidentally, as I read this they are showing the - Linda_H/FL on 1/28/23 9:46am |
|  Re: Coincidentally, as I read this they are showing the - MikeC/TX on 1/28/23 3:25pm |
| Re: Coincidentally, as I read this they are showing the - PaigeTurner on 1/28/23 5:10pm |
|  Video not on the media in entirety - PaigeTurner on 1/28/23 5:18pm |
| Re: Coincidentally, as I read this they are showing the - MikeC/TX on 1/28/23 5:51pm |
|  Re: Coincidentally, as I read this they are showing the - Linda_H/FL on 1/29/23 10:25am |
|  Not to pile on, but I'm going to - Linda_H/FL on 1/30/23 2:04pm |
|  Re: Not to pile on, but I - MikeC/TX on 1/30/23 4:44pm |
|  Re: Not to pile on, but I - Linda_H/FL on 1/30/23 4:46pm |
 |  knowing what you saw and assuming you know what happened - sigtogo/OR on 2/2/23 1:15pm |
| Re: Not to pile on, but I - MikeC/TX on 2/2/23 5:28pm |
|  #82169 thread - PaigeTurner on 2/3/23 11:08am |
|  seriously, that's your interpretation? trying to be funny? n/m - sigtogo/OR on 2/3/23 7:59pm |
|  Re: seriously, that - PaigeTurner on 2/4/23 2:40pm |
| Re: Not to pile on, but I - PaigeTurner on 1/31/23 7:37am |
| Re: Not to pile on, but I -  janCA on 2/2/23 1:33pm |
| Re: Not to pile on, but I - PaigeTurner on 2/2/23 2:17pm |
| Re: Not to pile on, but I - JanetK_CA on 2/2/23 7:25pm |
| Video didn't lie, problem is your assumptions. - sigtogo/OR on 2/3/23 8:33am |
| Re: Video didn - PaigeTurner on 2/3/23 11:19am |
