Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the


PAW has convinced me that the intent of the regulatory....
Posted by Bob_Chicago of IL on 5/4/07 1:15am Msg #188739
agencies was to only require that it be signed if there are two
bwrs. We went round and round on this.
That said, I have ALL bwrs , single and multiple ) sign the 1003 at the
top, unless I receive specific instuctions not to. (never happened to date.)
Most lenders and TCs instuct me to have it signed by single OR multiple bwrs.
I have heard plenty of stories where NSA were regd to go out to have a single
bwr sign the top. Hear of ONE instance (from PAW ) where he was regd to go
back out because single bwr signed top.
. The language was apparently written by a committe on strong medciation,
and can easily be interpreted both ways. I think that it could be easily clarifed by
adding something like " If there is only one borrower, do NOT sign here. "
I believe that the safest practice is to have single bwrs sign top.
PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message


Messages in this Thread
 new 1003 - Mary Irene Mccomb on 5/3/07 7:28pm
 Re: new 1003 -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 8:11pm
 Re: new 1003 - Lisa -  Sylvia_FL on 5/3/07 10:27pm
 Re: new 1003 - Lisa -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:10pm
 Re: new 1003 - Lisa -  LynnNC on 5/4/07 8:10am
 Where? - JanetLA on 5/3/07 9:01pm
 No, it really isn't open to interpretation -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 9:52pm
 Re: No, it really isn't open to interpretation - GF_CA on 5/3/07 10:24pm
 Re: No, it really isn't open to interpretation - pan/nd on 5/3/07 10:25pm
 Yes, it could (and should) be more simply put... -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:03pm
 Re: Yes, it could (and should) be more simply put... - pan/nd on 5/3/07 11:15pm
 From one mouse to another, I couldn't agree more -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:27pm
 YES it really IS open to interpretation - JanetLA on 5/4/07 8:28am
 Agree, JanetLA. I have single BOs put 'N/A' to show (s)he -  Susan Fischer on 5/5/07 10:59pm
 Re: new 1003 -  Joe Ewing on 5/3/07 10:48pm
 Re: new 1003 -  Joan Bergstrom on 5/3/07 11:12pm
 Maybe this will explain it... -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:24pm
 Re: Maybe this will explain it... - pan/nd on 5/3/07 11:37pm
 PAW has convinced me that the intent of the regulatory.... - Bob_Chicago on 5/4/07 1:15am
 Think who we are and what we do -  Ndwa on 5/4/07 2:41am
 Re: Think who we are and what we do -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/4/07 6:39am
 Crazy as it seems -  BrendaTx on 5/4/07 7:20am
 Re: Crazy as it seems - LauriecPA on 5/4/07 8:20am
 I do both ways... - Lee/AR on 5/4/07 8:30am
 One Would Think... -  Dennis D Broadbooks on 5/4/07 8:43am
 Re: One Would Think... - JanetLA on 5/4/07 8:56am
 Why Not? - Brad/AZ on 5/4/07 9:47am
 Re: One Would Think... -  BrendaTx on 5/4/07 12:57pm
 Re: new 1003 - Elizabeth Soliday on 5/4/07 12:40pm



 
Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
 
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2024, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.